2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10290-017-0287-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous effects of bilateral investment treaties

Abstract: Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) are an increasingly used policy instrument to encourage FDI inflows, particularly inflows into developing countries. In this paper we estimate a gravity model of FDI flows from a sample of OECD countries to a broader sample of developing economies, examining the impact of BITs on these flows. BITs are signed between highly heterogeneous country-pairs, with important differences found in terms of the institutional and economic distance between BIT signatories. These differen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a wide range of estimated effects on FDI in the literature; Bellak ( 2015 ) reported a wide range of BIT estimates on FDI, including positive, non-significant and negative (11% in total) estimated coefficients. Falvey and Foster-McGregor ( 2017 ) summarised how the literature responded to this ambiguity, concluding that BITs appear to have no impact upon FDI flows for country-pairs that are too dissimilar in terms of the strength of their political institutions. Therefore, the larger resemblance of home and host countries in IBC investment might explain their higher impact on IBC than aggregate FDI flows.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a wide range of estimated effects on FDI in the literature; Bellak ( 2015 ) reported a wide range of BIT estimates on FDI, including positive, non-significant and negative (11% in total) estimated coefficients. Falvey and Foster-McGregor ( 2017 ) summarised how the literature responded to this ambiguity, concluding that BITs appear to have no impact upon FDI flows for country-pairs that are too dissimilar in terms of the strength of their political institutions. Therefore, the larger resemblance of home and host countries in IBC investment might explain their higher impact on IBC than aggregate FDI flows.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a somewhat counterintuitive result since BITs is expected to favour FDI by reducing risks for investors (Desbordes & Vicard, 2009). Nonetheless, the empirical evidence suggests that the significance and sign associated to BIT can vary depending on the sector of investment (Colen, Persyn, & Guariso, 2016), the institutional distance between the source and host country (Falvey & Foster-McGregor, 2017), the intensity of bilateral FDI flows (Paniagua, Figueiredo, & Sapena, 2015) or the level of development of signing countries (Berger, Busse, Nunnenkamp, & Roy, 2011).…”
Section: Trade Openness and Gvcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a positive relation between BITs and FDI (Falvey and Foster-McGregor, 2017;Grosse and Trevino, 2005;Kerner, 2009;Neumayer and Spess, 2005;Salacuse and Sullivan, 2005). Salacuse and Sullivan (2005) stated the positive contribution of BITs to inward FDI in determining BITs effectiveness concerning foreign investment protection, market liberalization, and investment promotion.…”
Section: Property-rights Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The not-significant negative relationship between the signing of the BITs and inward FDI is in contrast with most of the literature expect the few studies that argue [288] for BITs reduced effectiveness when a host country suffers from weak political institutions (please see 4.4). In a weak institutional environment, BITs' role is limited to complement domestic institutions (Falvey and Foster-McGregor, 2017;Hallward-Driemeier, 2003). Also, the increased competition between the countries for inward FDI share reduces the significance of BITs as a determinant to FDI.…”
Section: ) Ethnic Identification In Northmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation