This paper asks whether elite colleges help students outside of historically advantaged groups reach top positions in the economy. I combine administrative data on income and leadership teams at publicly traded firms with a regression discontinuity design based on admissions rules at elite business-focused degree programs in Chile. The 1.8% of college students admitted to these programs account for 41%of leadership positions and 39% of top 0.1% incomes. Admission raises the number of leadership positions students hold by 44% and their probability of attaining a top 0.1% income by 51%. However, these gains are driven by male applicants from high-tuition private high schools, with zero effects for female students or students from other school types with similar admissions test scores. Admissions effects are equal to 38% of the gap in rates of top attainment by gender and 54% of the gap by high school background for male students. A difference-in-differences analysis of the rates at which pairs of students lead the same firms suggests that peer ties formed between college classmates from similar backgrounds may play an important role in driving the observed effects.1 The analysis proceeds in three steps. I first present new descriptive evidence on the distribution of firm leadership and top income attainment by educational background and student characteristics. I use data on the population of college-bound high-school graduates 3 from 1980 through 2001, and focus on two measures of top attainment: holding an executive management position or board seat at a publicly traded firm, or having an income in the top 0.1% of the observed income distribution. I measure these outcomes for students who are between 12 and 39 years removed from the year of college application, or roughly ages 30 through 57. This allows time for students to complete schooling and reach their career peaks. I find that the 1.8% of students admitted to three business-focused majors at the two most selective universities in Chile (henceforth 'elite degree programs') make up 41% of all directors and top managers, 27% of the top 1% of the income distribution between 2005 and 2013, 39% of the top 0.1%, and 45% of the top 0.01%. The gap between rates of leadership attainment at these elite degree programs and the average program is roughly similar to the gap observed in the US between Ivy League graduates and the average college graduate. Conditional on selectivity, major matters: students in top business-focused programs are 16.6 times more likely to have an income within the top 0.1% of the distribution than students in equally selective medical programs, where average incomes are also high. For students at elite degree programs, gender and family background are critical determinants of top attainment. Taking attendance at a hightuition private high school as a proxy for parental SES, I find that compared to male students from other backgrounds (female students), high-SES male students hold 3.4 (6.7) times more leadership positions and are 4.2 (11.4) t...