Field characteristics of crustal extrusion zones include: high-grade metamorphism flanked by lower-grade rocks; broadly coeval flanking shear zones with opposing senses of shear; early ductile fabrics successively overprinted by semi-brittle and brittle structures; and localization of strain to give a more extensive deformation history within the extrusion zone relative to the flanking regions. Crustal extrusion, involving a combination of pure and simple shear, is a regular consequence of bulk orogenic thickening and contraction during continental collision. Extrusion can occur in response to different tectonic settings, and need not necessarily imply a driving force linked to mid-crustal channel flow. In most situations, field criteria alone are unlikely to be sufficient to determine the driving causes of extrusion. This is illustrated with examples from the Nanga Parbat-Haramosh Massif in the Pakistan Himalaya, and the Wing Pond Shear Zone in Newfoundland.In this paper we review channel flow and crustal extrusion in relation to field geology. Our aim is to provide a critical evaluation of whether the predictions of channel flow models are testable using field observations, and also to consider the relevance of channel flow in relation to existing models of crustal extrusion. We illustrate the inherent difficulty and ambiguity of applying the channel flow concept with field examples from both active and ancient orogens (the Nanga Parbat-Haramosh Massif, Pakistan Himalaya, and the Wing Pond Shear Zone in the Appalachian orogen, Newfoundland). General aspects of orogenic thickening and crustal extrusion are presented first, followed by more specific discussion of channel flow and the nature and limitations of possible diagnostic characteristics.