1975
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2797(75)90024-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous distribution of DNA alkylation products in rat liver chromatin after in vivo administration of N,N-DI[14C]methylnitrosamine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Craddock (1973) has demonstrated that the half-life of m3A was 7 h in regenerating liver compared to 3 h in nonregenerating liver. In addition, since the sites of carcinogen interaction with DNA are nonrandomly distributed in DNA and the rates of removal of DNA-bound carcinogen from different regions of DNA are not the same (Cooper et al, 1975;Ramanathan et al, 1976a,b;Moyer et al, 1977;Metzger et al, 1977;Sarma et al, 1978;Schwartz & Goodman, 1979), and since only 21% of the liver DNA was anaylzed (see Table I), it is possible that the methylated bases characterized in the present study may constitute a selective distribution in certain segments of DNA that can be fractionated as hybrid DNA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Craddock (1973) has demonstrated that the half-life of m3A was 7 h in regenerating liver compared to 3 h in nonregenerating liver. In addition, since the sites of carcinogen interaction with DNA are nonrandomly distributed in DNA and the rates of removal of DNA-bound carcinogen from different regions of DNA are not the same (Cooper et al, 1975;Ramanathan et al, 1976a,b;Moyer et al, 1977;Metzger et al, 1977;Sarma et al, 1978;Schwartz & Goodman, 1979), and since only 21% of the liver DNA was anaylzed (see Table I), it is possible that the methylated bases characterized in the present study may constitute a selective distribution in certain segments of DNA that can be fractionated as hybrid DNA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it has been widely appreciated that mammalian cells repair radiation and chemical damage to DNA (4,5), recent advances in the understanding of chromatin structure (6,7) have focused attention on the importance of examining the role of chromatin structure in the repair process. In fact, work from several laboratories (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14), including our own (15)(16)(17), has emphasized that an analysis of chromatin structure is crucial for understanding DNA damage and repair.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%