2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00338-013-1070-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous dissolved organic nitrogen supply over a coral reef: first evidence from nitrogen stable isotope ratios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it is well-known that cyanobacterial mats and turf algae on coral reefs fix N 2 and that δ 15 N signatures of cyanobacterial mats are lower than of other benthic primary producers ( Table 3 ; Kayanne et al, 2005 ; Kolasinski et al, 2016 ). Released products from these mats contain N compounds lower in δ 15 N than N released by macroalgae or pelagic primary producers ( Kayanne et al, 2005 ; Thibodeau et al, 2013 ; Brocke et al, 2015 ). In the Caribbean significant increases in cyanobacterial mat cover on coral reefs were reported from less than 10 to more than 20% since ∼1990 ( De Bakker et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is well-known that cyanobacterial mats and turf algae on coral reefs fix N 2 and that δ 15 N signatures of cyanobacterial mats are lower than of other benthic primary producers ( Table 3 ; Kayanne et al, 2005 ; Kolasinski et al, 2016 ). Released products from these mats contain N compounds lower in δ 15 N than N released by macroalgae or pelagic primary producers ( Kayanne et al, 2005 ; Thibodeau et al, 2013 ; Brocke et al, 2015 ). In the Caribbean significant increases in cyanobacterial mat cover on coral reefs were reported from less than 10 to more than 20% since ∼1990 ( De Bakker et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…): δ15Nexp=δ15Nfw×fx×Nfw+δ15Nmarine×()1fx×NmarineNfw+Nmarine where the freshwater δ 15 N composition of riverine (δ 15 N fw ; measured upstream) and tidal marine (δ 15 N marine ) are used to calculate δ 15 N exp based on the N concentration of the respective end‐members ( N fw and N marine ) and the fraction of freshwater present at each sampled point ( f x ). Two δ 15 N marine values (1‰, 5‰) were used to span the reported range from values for “new” N entering the surface ocean (low end‐member) to surface ocean δ 15 N‐TDN values (high end‐member) (Knapp et al , ; Ryabenko et al ; Thibodeau et al ). This δ 15 N range corresponds with those for algae in Moreton Bay at the BRE mouth (0–7‰) (Costanzo et al ) and for Coral Sea TDN and NO 3 − (2–5‰) (Erler et al ; Yoshikawa et al ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4b, c) but were negligible overall during the ebb tide (Table 2). Previous studies of reef nutrient fluxes in flumes or other controlled environments have generally shown uptake approaching the limits of mass transfer for NH + 4 (e.g., Atkinson et al, 1994;Cornelisen and Thomas, 2009;Larned and Atkinson, 1997;Thomas and Atkinson, 1997), DIP (reviewed in Cuet et al, 2011b), and, less frequently, for NO x (e.g., Baird et al, 2004); these controlled environments lack some of the confounding processes present in natural reef communities. Yet net release of nutrients (especially NO x ) clearly occurs in situ as concentrations on many reefs exceed those offshore (e.g., Hatcher and Frith, 1985;Leichter et al, 2013;Rasheed et al, 2002), and release rates up to 20 mmol NO x m −2 d −1 , 12 mmol NH + 4 m −2 d −1 , and 2 mmol DIP m −2 d −1 have been measured with in situ studies (Miyajima et al, 2007a, b;Silverman et al, 2012; Wyatt et al, 2012).…”
Section: Rates and Sources Of Benthic Release Of Din And Dipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the uptake rate has a first-order relationship with nutrient concentration and is a function of water velocity, bottom roughness properties, and diffusion characteristics of the solute (Atkinson, 2011). Due to the dependency of mass-transfer-limited nutrient uptake on flow speed, the local hydrodynamic conditions within a reef directly affect uptake rates of DIN and DIP (Atkinson and Bilger, 1992;Baird et al, 2004;Reidenbach et al, 2006;Thomas and Atkinson, 1997), and these uptake rates can be predicted for a particular reef given sufficient information (Falter et al, 2004;Zhang et al, 2011). However, validating these models with observations from living systems remains a major challenge, as measurements must occur at spatial and temporal scales relevant to reef circulation, and in situ uptake is often confounded by simultaneously occurring biogeochemical processes that release DIN and DIP into the water column (Atkinson and Falter, 2003;Wyatt et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%