2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevmaterials.3.060601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous disconnection nucleation mechanisms during grain boundary migration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such gap between disconnection-containing GBs in real materials and those used in atomistic simulations that are often perfect and separating only two grains (bicrystals) may explain why the observed coupling factors (low) differ from the simulated ones (high). In fact, atomistic simulations of real GBs are only beginning, addressing the possible influence of defects present prior to deformation such as vacancies [78] or immobile disconnections [79]. A second reason for the current mismatch between the observed and simulated coupling factors may be the complex stress tensor acting locally on real GBs in small-grained metals whereas atomistic simulations involve perfectly defined and often homogenous stress states [80].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such gap between disconnection-containing GBs in real materials and those used in atomistic simulations that are often perfect and separating only two grains (bicrystals) may explain why the observed coupling factors (low) differ from the simulated ones (high). In fact, atomistic simulations of real GBs are only beginning, addressing the possible influence of defects present prior to deformation such as vacancies [78] or immobile disconnections [79]. A second reason for the current mismatch between the observed and simulated coupling factors may be the complex stress tensor acting locally on real GBs in small-grained metals whereas atomistic simulations involve perfectly defined and often homogenous stress states [80].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in clinopyroxene, the nature and abundance of atomic impurities in olivine (e.g., Ni, Cr, Ti) are commonly used as petrogenetic indicators, specifically targeting deep crustal and mantle processes such as partial melting or metasomatism (e.g., Ringwood, 1955a, b;O'Reilly et al, 1997;De Hoog et al, 2010;Foley et al, 2013;Sanfilippo et al, 2017;Neave et al, 2018). Atomic impurities are also used as proxies for equilibrium temperature (Ca in olivine and co-existing orthopyroxene) and pressure (Al in olivine; e.g., Brey and Kohler, 1990;Witt-Eickschen and O'Neill, 2005;Coogan et al, 2014;D'Souza et al, 2020;Bussweiler et al, 2017). Thanks to recent technical advances, we can now measure a broad array of atomic impurities in olivine, from heavy (e.g., Th, U, at concentrations > 1 ppb) to light (e.g., Li) elements, by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS; e.g., Tollan et al, 2018;Bussweiler et al, 2019;Batanova et al, 2019;Demouchy and Alard, 2021).…”
Section: Extrinsic Point Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This twin thickening controlled by twin dislocation sources resulting from slip dissociations at twin interfaces is referred as slip-assisted [35]. Sources of disconnections in {1012} twin boundary [29,[36][37][38], in {112} twin boundary [39] and in {410} grain boundary [40] are examples for hcp, bcc and fcc crystals respectively. If the twin dislocation source does not require previous slip activity, the source is slip dislocation-independent [35].…”
Section: Sources Of Disconnectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%