2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3580671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous Cross Project Defect Prediction in Software

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Voting method integrates multiple based classifiers and adopts the strategy of minority obeys majority in the prediction process. The existing researches prove that Random Forest and Naïve Bayes have good performances as a single classification in CPDP while J48's and REPTree's performances are mediocre [20][21][22][23]. In Voting method, these four classifications can correct each other as strong and weak classifications.…”
Section: Feature Transfer By Pearson Correlation Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Voting method integrates multiple based classifiers and adopts the strategy of minority obeys majority in the prediction process. The existing researches prove that Random Forest and Naïve Bayes have good performances as a single classification in CPDP while J48's and REPTree's performances are mediocre [20][21][22][23]. In Voting method, these four classifications can correct each other as strong and weak classifications.…”
Section: Feature Transfer By Pearson Correlation Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%