2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.08.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneity of nutrition care procedures in nutrition guidelines for cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of quality assessment for the guidelines in this study are similar to the results in previous studies [ 10 , 12 , 14 ], which are mainly related to the different methodologies adopted by different guideline development teams.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings of quality assessment for the guidelines in this study are similar to the results in previous studies [ 10 , 12 , 14 ], which are mainly related to the different methodologies adopted by different guideline development teams.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This tool has been validated in guideline evaluation studies in critical care medicine, pain medicine, urinary system diseases, nutrition support, etc. [ 10 14 ]. Currently, there is no guideline appraisal for the management of malignant pleural effusion and ascites available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent international review of nutrition care procedures in nutrition-specific guidelines for patients with cancer identified 17 guidelines [21]. Using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) methodology to evaluate the quality of those guidelines, Zhao et al rated the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) [11] guidelines and Australian guidelines [22] as having the highest total quality scores (>60%).…”
Section: International Nutrition-specific Oncology Care Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) methodology to evaluate the quality of those guidelines, Zhao et al rated the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) [11] guidelines and Australian guidelines [22] as having the highest total quality scores (>60%). They further evaluated 12 of the guidelines and found heterogeneity in the content/tools of nutrition screening and/or assessment, application of immune nutrients, and selection of nutrition support pathways, and they concluded that the quality of nutrition guidelines for patients with cancer was highly variable [21].…”
Section: International Nutrition-specific Oncology Care Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation