2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10452-020-09823-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneity of macrophyte banks affects the structure of fish communities in flooded habitats of the Amazon Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, there were positive associations between arthropod and fish diversities. It is possible that this positive fish‐arthropod association was driven by the high macrophyte diversity in rainforest biome, which facilitates coexistence between fishes and arthropods via increasing habitat heterogeneity (García‐Girón et al, 2020; Nonato et al, 2021). Beyond the positive effect of macrophytes on animal diversity, we found positive effects of macrophyte on fish and arthropod biomasses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, there were positive associations between arthropod and fish diversities. It is possible that this positive fish‐arthropod association was driven by the high macrophyte diversity in rainforest biome, which facilitates coexistence between fishes and arthropods via increasing habitat heterogeneity (García‐Girón et al, 2020; Nonato et al, 2021). Beyond the positive effect of macrophytes on animal diversity, we found positive effects of macrophyte on fish and arthropod biomasses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because no single species can simultaneously account for all functions at different times and locations (Mori et al, 2018). Perhaps more importantly, since aquatic plants can be considered as surrogates for the biodiversity of multiple taxonomic groups, ranging from fish to protozoans (Law et al, 2019; Moi, Evangelista, et al, 2021; Nonato et al, 2021), the invasion of U. arrecta will likely result in cascading effects at the entire ecosystem level. Considering that this invasive grass has been recorded in freshwater and brackish ecosystems in several Neotropical countries, such as Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Honduras, Mexico, Peru, Trinidad‐Tobago, Venezuela and the United States of America (Global Biodiversity Information Facility; http://www.gbif.org/), we urge that U. arrecta should be included in the policy decisions and management agendas that aim to protect native biodiversity of standing freshwater ecosystems in the Americas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because no single species can simultaneously account for all functions at different times and locations (Mori et al, 2018). Perhaps more importantly, since aquatic plants can be considered as surrogates for the biodiversity of multiple taxonomic groups, ranging from fish to protozoans (Law et al, 2019;Moi, Evangelista, et al, 2021;Nonato et al, 2021), the invasion of U. arrecta will likely result in cascading effects at the entire ecosystem level. Considering that this invasive grass has been recorded in freshwater and brackish ecosystems in…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nektonic species, such as M. oligolepis, A. epae, and J. pirana, found in the Characiformes/Cichliformes group, are continuous swimmers and move vertically in the water column, often being found in places of slow flow (Watson and Balon 1984). In the Gymnotifomes group, some species live associated with environments with the presence of roots, litter and aquatic plants, where the water flow is often attenuated (Henderson and Hamilton 1995;Nonato et al 2021), such as Gymnotus Table 4. Weighted average of the indices of all species present in the fish assemblage sampled in each of 10 streams in the Juruena River sub-basin (Mato Grosso state, Brazil), reflecting phenotypes within each stream.…”
Section: Environmental Variables Pca1 Pca2mentioning
confidence: 99%