1988
DOI: 10.1016/0006-291x(88)90567-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneity of human liver, muscle, and adipose tissue insulin receptor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Caro et al (1988) obtained a protein yield in adipose tissue similar to that found in this study. The yield range in carp ovaries was approximately the half that obtained in carp skeletal muscle (Pdrrizas et al 1991).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Caro et al (1988) obtained a protein yield in adipose tissue similar to that found in this study. The yield range in carp ovaries was approximately the half that obtained in carp skeletal muscle (Pdrrizas et al 1991).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, the difference in the hepatic and extrahepatic response to insulin in the diabetic subjects is unlikely to be solely due to slowed equilibration between blood and interstitial insulin concentrations because this presumably would be associated with a delayed rather than a virtually absent response to insulin. Alternatively the discordance between the severity of hepatic and extrahepatic insulin resistance may be due to differences in liver and muscle insulin binding and/or signal transduction (29)(30)(31). Insulin increases glucose uptake in muscle primarily by increasing the translocation of glucose transporters to the plasma membrane whereas it decreases hepatic glucose release by altering the activity of glycogenolytic and gluconeogenic enzymes (13,32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11), except for the much weaker competition observed with MA-20 in our purified receptor system. Thus, the observed differences may reflect some tissue specificity (e.g., glycosylation), as recently suggested (37), rather than conformational alternations due to receptor purification. These differences, however, do not appear to change the major characteristics of the receptor kinetics.…”
Section: ) Antibodies On 125i-insulin Disso-mentioning
confidence: 99%