2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneity of Human Breast Stem and Progenitor Cells as Revealed by Transcriptional Profiling

Abstract: SummaryDuring development, the mammary gland undergoes extensive remodeling driven by stem cells. Breast cancers are also hierarchically organized and driven by cancer stem cells characterized by CD44+CD24low/− or aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) expression. These markers identify mesenchymal and epithelial populations both capable of tumor initiation. Less is known about these populations in non-cancerous mammary glands. From RNA sequencing, ALDH+ and ALDH−CD44+CD24− human mammary cells have epithelial-like and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
89
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our model predicts that mesenchymal-like CSCs localize at the invasive edge of the tumor and hybrid E/M CSCs localize in the tumor interior. This prediction agrees well, at least qualitatively, with recent observations in human breast carcinoma tissue, where CD44+/CD24-cells (mesenchymal CSCs) were present at the tumor invasive edge, while ALDH1+ cells (hybrid E/M CSCs (20,31)) were present in the interior of the tumor (9). However, we acknowledge that our First, we assumed a spatial profile of TGF-β based on its secretion from stromal cells; however, there may be local variations in TGF-β signal intensity due to a variety of mechanical and/or chemical stimuli, including its secretion by cancer cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our model predicts that mesenchymal-like CSCs localize at the invasive edge of the tumor and hybrid E/M CSCs localize in the tumor interior. This prediction agrees well, at least qualitatively, with recent observations in human breast carcinoma tissue, where CD44+/CD24-cells (mesenchymal CSCs) were present at the tumor invasive edge, while ALDH1+ cells (hybrid E/M CSCs (20,31)) were present in the interior of the tumor (9). However, we acknowledge that our First, we assumed a spatial profile of TGF-β based on its secretion from stromal cells; however, there may be local variations in TGF-β signal intensity due to a variety of mechanical and/or chemical stimuli, including its secretion by cancer cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…1A). Follow-up studies have characterized these ALDH1+ cells as showing a hybrid E/M, and not a purely epithelial, signature (31).…”
Section: A Gradient Of Emt-inducing Signal Recapitulates the Experimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technology allows the identification of the cellular subpopulations and the delineation of novel cell markers in the hematopoietic [71], respiratory [72], hepatobiliary [73], and pancreatic [74, 75] lineages, as well as in the intestine [76]. Recent progress in single-cell RNA sequencing led to the identification of the heterogeneous origins of CSCs in gliomas [77], breast cancers [78], myeloid leukemias [79], bladder cancers [80], and colorectal cancers [81]. These heterogeneities stem from the original unidentified subpopulations that arise during the step of induction of cancer-specific iPSCs.…”
Section: Advantages Provided For Cancer Research By Cancer Cell Repromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea is supported by data from AI-induced dormant tumours that express increased levels of ALDH1A1 and ALDH1A3 genes. Recently, single-cell RNA profiling of normal breast samples identified four cell clusters within the ALDH+ cell population (Colacino et al, 2018). Interestingly, Population B resembles cluster 3 identified in this publication, which was characterized by high expression of mesenchymal markers, including SNAI2, and low expression of proliferative genes, such as KI67, PCNA, CCND1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%