1992
DOI: 10.1002/ar.1092320109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneity of fiber and sarcomere length in the human masseter muscle

Abstract: This study deals with regional differences in the architectural design of the human masseter muscle. For a number of defined muscle regions the three-dimensional coordinates of origin and insertion points, and the lengths of the muscle fibers and the sarcomeres were determined in the closed jaw position. Measurements were made from cadavers and the data were used as input for a model predicting sarcomere length at other mandibular positions. At a closed jaw average muscle fiber length of the muscle regions ran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
46
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both opener and closer should reach optimum length at a relatively small degree (5-10°) of jaw opening. However, there is evidence that muscles within the same functional group and portions of the same muscle do not use the same part of the length-tension curve, and this can be explained mainly by differences in architecture and different moment arm lengths (masseter: van Eijden and Raadsheer, 1992;pterygoids: van Eijden et al, 1995;temporalis: van Eijden et al, 1996). In the literature, a number of studies have been done in which SL has been measured in (some of) the jaw closers and jaw openers in animals (rat: Nordstrom et al, 1974;rabbit: Hertzberg et al, 1980;Weijs and van der Wielen-Drent, 1982;miniature pig: Herring et al, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both opener and closer should reach optimum length at a relatively small degree (5-10°) of jaw opening. However, there is evidence that muscles within the same functional group and portions of the same muscle do not use the same part of the length-tension curve, and this can be explained mainly by differences in architecture and different moment arm lengths (masseter: van Eijden and Raadsheer, 1992;pterygoids: van Eijden et al, 1995;temporalis: van Eijden et al, 1996). In the literature, a number of studies have been done in which SL has been measured in (some of) the jaw closers and jaw openers in animals (rat: Nordstrom et al, 1974;rabbit: Hertzberg et al, 1980;Weijs and van der Wielen-Drent, 1982;miniature pig: Herring et al, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, different muscles and different parts of the same muscle should operate on different parts of the length-tension relationship. This action should lead to a broadening of the relationship between jaw angle and the resultant jaw elevator or depressor force and to a broadening of the length-tension relationship of the separate muscles (masseter: van Eijden and Raadsheer, 1992;pterygoids: van Eijden et al, 1995;temporalis: van Eijden et al, 1996). The capability of each muscle of producing different mechanical actions is enhanced by a taskdependent regional contraction of muscle portions (masseter: Belser and Hannam, 1986;McMillan and Hannam, 1992;van Eijden et al, 1993;temporalis: van Eijden et al, 1990;McMillan, 1993;van Eijden, 1990, 1995) and by the heterogeneous distribution of fiber types (Mao et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, heterogeneity of sarcomere lengths within muscle has been demonstrated within in vivo muscle as well as in situ muscle (e.g. van Eijden and Raadsheer, 1992;Zuurbier and Huijing, 1993;Willems and Huijing, 1994;Pappas et al, 2002;Ahn et al, 2003). In addition, mechanical interaction between neighbouring muscles and extramuscular connective tissue, causes unequal forces to be exerted at proximal and distal tendons of muscles in the rat anterior tibial compartment (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, during jaw movements, fiber and sarcomere excursions are probably not the same for various muscle portions, and as a consequence the maximum force and the excursion range of the muscle portions may differ. Such intramuscular differences have been demonstrated in other human jaw muscles (masseter: Van Eijden and Raadsheer, 1992;pterygoid: Van Eijden et al, 1995) but have thus far not been documented for the temporalis muscle. In addition, electromyographic studies in which fine wire electrodes have been inserted into different muscle portions of the temporalis demonstrate a differential activation of muscle portions, depending on the motor task that is executed Van Eijden, 1990, 1995;McMillan, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%