Heterogeneity in the information content of 8-K disclosures about private targets: Acquirer size and target significance

Bayar, Onur; Das, Sougata; Kesici, Emre

doi:10.1016/j.gfj.2020.100559

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…First, we computed cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) by summing the ARs across the event window. This approach has been widely used in market reaction studies (e.g., Bayar et al, 2020; Rahim et al, 2014). A weakness of the CAR approach is that it does not capture the actual abnormal return earned by an investor who held the stock during the entire event period.…”

Section: Market Reaction Methods and Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Costs associated with exit or disposal activities: A topic modeling investigation of disclosure and market reaction

Cullinan,

Holowczak,

Louton

et al. 2023

Intell Sys Acc Fin Mgmt

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryThe Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) mandates disclosure of exit or disposal activity events in 8‐K filings. We use Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), a topic modeling method from computational linguistics, to investigate the possibility that substantively different event types may be subsumed under Item 2.05, the SEC category for costs associated with exit or disposal activities. Our analysis reveals that four distinct topics are reported under the Item 2.05 umbrella category: (1) restructuring, (2) disposal of a line of business, (3) plant closings, and (4) layoffs/workforce reductions. We then investigate various aspects of these 8‐K filings. We find that the market reacts most negatively to workforce reductions that are reported in the absence of a broader strategic initiative. Subsequent amendments to the Item 2.05 8‐K filings are significantly more likely for restructuring initiatives, and significantly less likely for layoffs. Asset impairment charges most frequently accompany line‐of‐business disposals and plant closings. Our results demonstrate that there are meaningful differences between the event types reported within Item 2.05 filings and that LDA provides a useful means of differentiating among these event types.

show abstract

Section: Market Reaction Methods and Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%