Cooperativity in human glucokinase (GCK), the body's primary glucose sensor and a major determinant of glucose homeostatic diseases, is fundamentally different from textbook models of allostery because GCK is monomeric and contains only one glucosebinding site. Prior work has demonstrated that millisecond timescale order-disorder transitions within the enzyme's small domain govern cooperativity. Here, using limited proteolysis, we map the site of disorder in unliganded GCK to a 30-residue active-site loop that closes upon glucose binding. Positional randomization of the loop, coupled with genetic selection in a glucokinase-deficient bacterium, uncovers a hyperactive GCK variant with substantially reduced cooperativity. Biochemical and structural analysis of this loop variant and GCK variants associated with hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia reveal two distinct mechanisms of enzyme activation. In α-type activation, glucose affinity is increased, the proteolytic susceptibility of the active site loop is suppressed and the 1 H-13 C heteronuclear multiple quantum coherence (HMQC) spectrum of 13 C-Ile-labeled enzyme resembles the glucose-bound state. In β-type activation, glucose affinity is largely unchanged, proteolytic susceptibility of the loop is enhanced, and the 1 H-13 C HMQC spectrum reveals no perturbation in ensemble structure. Leveraging both activation mechanisms, we engineer a fully noncooperative GCK variant, whose functional properties are indistinguishable from other hexokinase isozymes, and which displays a 100-fold increase in catalytic efficiency over wild-type GCK. This work elucidates specific structural features responsible for generating allostery in a monomeric enzyme and suggests a general strategy for engineering cooperativity into proteins that lack the structural framework typical of traditional allosteric systems.lucidating the molecular origins of allosteric regulation of protein function remains a primary goal of biochemistry, despite nearly a half-century of intense investigation (1). Early classical theories, such as the Monod-Wyman-Changeux (2) and Koshland-Nemethy-Filmer (3) models, have found utility in describing allosteric transitions (4, 5), but they are phenomenological in nature and lack a quantitative, predictive description of the underlying mechanism (6). Traditional models tend to describe allostery in terms of structural transitions between two discrete end states that are often viewed through the lens of static crystal structures. Recent focus on the role of dynamics (7,8) and intrinsic disorder in protein structures (9-11) demonstrates that classic models are far from general (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). The ensemble allosteric model (6, 20) and the allosteric two-state model (21) reflect attempts to account for the role of dynamics and disorder in allosteric regulation. Identifying the full suite of structural and dynamic contributors to cooperativity promises to facilitate the discovery and understanding of new allosteric mechanisms that have precluded explanation to...