2019
DOI: 10.1101/701342
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneities in intrinsic excitability and frequency-dependent response properties of granule cells across the blades of the rat dentate gyrus

Abstract: Number of words: 249 (Abstract)Abbreviated title: Intrinsic heterogeneities in dentate gyrus granule cells Author contributions P. M. and R. N. designed experiments; P. M. performed experiments; P.M. and R.N. carried out data analysis; P. M. and R. N. co-wrote the paper. ABSTRACTThe dentate gyrus (DG), the input gate to the hippocampus proper, is anatomically segregated into three different sectors, namely the suprapyramidal blade, the crest region and the infrapyramidal blade. Although there are well-establis… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 151 publications
(239 reference statements)
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some important anatomical caveats to consider when evaluating much of the work discussed in this review, specifically concerning where within the DG data were collected. For instance, there are differences in connectivity, excitability, inhibition, IEG expression, and levels of neurogenesis between the suprapyramidal versus infrapyramidal blade (Chawla et al, 2005; Claiborne, Amaral, & Cowan, 1986; Mishra & Narayanan, 2020; Ramírez‐Amaya et al, 2005), suggesting the two blades may serve different functional roles (Schmidt, Marrone, & Markus, 2012). An additional major consideration is the location along the dorsal‐ventral axis of the hippocampus.…”
Section: Dorsal‐ventral Dentate Gyrusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some important anatomical caveats to consider when evaluating much of the work discussed in this review, specifically concerning where within the DG data were collected. For instance, there are differences in connectivity, excitability, inhibition, IEG expression, and levels of neurogenesis between the suprapyramidal versus infrapyramidal blade (Chawla et al, 2005; Claiborne, Amaral, & Cowan, 1986; Mishra & Narayanan, 2020; Ramírez‐Amaya et al, 2005), suggesting the two blades may serve different functional roles (Schmidt, Marrone, & Markus, 2012). An additional major consideration is the location along the dorsal‐ventral axis of the hippocampus.…”
Section: Dorsal‐ventral Dentate Gyrusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such bladespecific recruitment could emerge from underlying cell-intrinsic and/or circuit differences between the blades of the DG, and the activity-predisposed GC subtype we identify here likely uses both mechanisms of preferential recruitment. At the cellintrinsic level, predisposed cells have many differentially expressed genes relative to classical granule cells (Figure S3), which likely underpin differential single-cell computation (Figure 4;Mishra and Narayanan, 2020). At the circuit level, although gross projection differences are not seen between the blades (Scharfman, 2007;van Groen et al, 2003; but see Wyss et al, 1979), the relatively displaced cell bodies and broader dendritic trees likely produce differential integration of long-range inputs.…”
Section: Discovery and Implications Of Blade-specific Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independently from their mode of action, effects of neurogenesis were generally assumed to be homogeneous within the DG. However, recent studies highlighted that adult-born neurons differentially modulate input from the entorhinal cortex into the DG (Luna et al, 2019), which is further supported by an intrinsic heterogeneity in the cellular composition of its infra-vs. supra-pyramidal (IP and SP, respectively) blades (Erwin et al, 2020;Mishra and Narayanan, 2020). Intriguingly, the IP and SP blades are known to preferentially receive input about spatial information or novelty that originate from the medial or lateral entorhinal cortex, respectively (Hargreaves et al, 2005;Knierim et al, 2014;Luna et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%