“…We thus performed SAXS measurements for 5 monolithic MG samples in Figure , in which the scattering intensity I ( q ) vs q follows a power–law relationship, I ( q ) ∼ (1/ q ) D . ,, However, for different MGs, q ranges in which the power–law relationship exists are different. By taking a similar q range of about 0.008–0.025 Å –1 ( 2 π /q ≈ 250–785 Å), all five studied MG samples follow the power–law with scaling exponents of D = 2.71 ± 0.15, 2.72 ± 0.25, 2.49 ± 0.25, 2.64 ± 0.15, and 2.57 ± 0.25 for Cu 45 Zr 46 Al 7.5 Ti 1.5 , Au 55 Cu 25 Si 20 , Au 55 Cu 25 Ag 5 Si 15 , Cu 46 Zr 46 Al 8 , and Zr 46 Cu 30.14 Ag 8.36 Al 8 Be 7.5 MGs, respectively, consistent with previous reports. − It should be mentioned that scaling exponents deduced by fitting the range of linear part are almost similar within the experimental uncertainty. Although different MG samples have different q ranges exhibiting the power–law relationship, the normalized scattering intensity I ( q ), i.e., I ( q )/ I max , where I max is the maximum intensity of I ( q ) for each MG sample studied, as a function of the normalized q , i.e., q / q min , where q min is the minimum of q for each MG sample studied at which the power–law relationship starts, are plotted in Figure .…”