2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneities dominate mechanical performance of additively manufactured metal lattice struts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers investigate the defects of the structures fabricated by SLM or AM (additive manufacturing). It was noted that struts waviness, strut oversizing or strut thickness variation is prevalent on lattice structures fabricated by SLM [9,[37][38][39][40][41] with horizontal struts features showing more severe geometric imperfections than vertical struts and diagonal struts [9,39,41,42]. Moreover, vertical struts were found to be thinner than as-designed ones [9,37,39], and the magnitude of strut oversizing can change the failure mode from one to another [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some researchers investigate the defects of the structures fabricated by SLM or AM (additive manufacturing). It was noted that struts waviness, strut oversizing or strut thickness variation is prevalent on lattice structures fabricated by SLM [9,[37][38][39][40][41] with horizontal struts features showing more severe geometric imperfections than vertical struts and diagonal struts [9,39,41,42]. Moreover, vertical struts were found to be thinner than as-designed ones [9,37,39], and the magnitude of strut oversizing can change the failure mode from one to another [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SLM parameters also affect the mechanical properties of lattice structures [3,43]. Horizontal struts are the first to fracture, indicating they are experiencing greater stress than neighboring struts [41,44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective moduli of a periodic beam lattice can be derived using standard open-source software [11]. The morphology of actual cellular materials, however, in many cases deviates from the periodicity and there is a significant difference between "as-designed" and "as-manufactured" materials [12][13][14], vastly affecting their performance [2]. The corresponding knockdown of effective moduli owing to imperfections is, besides the aforementioned works, considered in [15] for three-dimensional foams, in [16] for beam lattices modeling twodimensional cellular materials, and in [6] for spring lattice systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It allows a larger freedom in designing parts but comes along with some limitations. Inherited defects such as a large surface roughness, a variable dimensional accuracy, and a characteristic porosity have been widely studied . The as‐built surface can be detrimental for lattice structures for which no machining can be used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inherited defects such as a large surface roughness, a variable dimensional accuracy, and a characteristic porosity have been widely studied. [13][14][15][16] The as-built surface can be detrimental for lattice structures for which no machining can be used. The discrimination of most detrimental defects for parts fabricated by E-PBF under tensile loading has been studied for fatigue applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%