2011
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2010.2100094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterodyne Detection by Miniature Neon Indicator Lamp Glow Discharge Detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was shown that the performance of GDDs is similar to that of pyro-electric detectors, with good Noise Equivalent Power (NEP) for a room temperature detector [5]. Down conversion based on heterodyne detection was demonstrated using the GDD at 10 GHz [14]. Furthermore, it was found that the GDD can be used as a pixel in diffraction limited THz Focal Plane Arrays [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It was shown that the performance of GDDs is similar to that of pyro-electric detectors, with good Noise Equivalent Power (NEP) for a room temperature detector [5]. Down conversion based on heterodyne detection was demonstrated using the GDD at 10 GHz [14]. Furthermore, it was found that the GDD can be used as a pixel in diffraction limited THz Focal Plane Arrays [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Application based MMW, as described above are well needed. Previous works of using very inexpensive Glow Discharge Detectors (GDD) in W-band were performed and presented [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. The GDD is a low-pressure miniature neon indicator lamp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of the GDD were described in detail in [12]. In the last few years small GDD arrays such as 8 × 8 FPA and an 18 × 2 scanner have been developed and tested, and found to yield very good MMW image quality despite the large size and dimensions of the lamps [12][13][14][15]. Recent results include the use of oversampling sub-pixel shifting to obtain high resolution images [12] on the order of 0.9 milliradians in special circumstances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FMCW advantages and disadvantages are described briefly in [4], and the two methods, FMCW and direct detection, are compared. Using very inexpensive GDDs in the W-band [5], the use of a receiving antenna is eliminated since the detection of the radiation and the beat frequency generation is performed directly by the GDD [6,7] acting as a mixer. A complete description of the GDD detection system that is used here to detect FMCW signals is described in detail in [5,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%