2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2007.00754.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterochrony and its role in sex determination of cryptically dioecious Consolea (Cactaceae) staminate flowers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(105 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, there is an apparent transition between breeding system and ploidy level. The change from hermaphroditism to trioecy is coupled with an increase in chromosome number in P. pringlei and is consistent with polyploidisation events reported for other cacti with non-hermaphroditic sexual systems (Valiente-Banuet et al 1997, Fleming et al 1998, Strittmatter 2002, Díaz and Cocucci 2003, Strittmatter et al 2006, 2008). Our results imply that in P. pringlei the hermaphrodite system is diploid and restricted to ICA and ICE, whereas the tetraploid condition is essentially associated with unisexual, dioecious, gynodioecious and trioecious breeding systems (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In fact, there is an apparent transition between breeding system and ploidy level. The change from hermaphroditism to trioecy is coupled with an increase in chromosome number in P. pringlei and is consistent with polyploidisation events reported for other cacti with non-hermaphroditic sexual systems (Valiente-Banuet et al 1997, Fleming et al 1998, Strittmatter 2002, Díaz and Cocucci 2003, Strittmatter et al 2006, 2008). Our results imply that in P. pringlei the hermaphrodite system is diploid and restricted to ICA and ICE, whereas the tetraploid condition is essentially associated with unisexual, dioecious, gynodioecious and trioecious breeding systems (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…These include monopodial trunks, as in Brasiliopuntia , hairy seeds as in Brasiliopuntia , Tacinga , and some members of Opuntia s.s. (Stuppy, 2002), hook‐shaped embryos as in Tacinga (Stuppy, 2002), and expanded floral nectaries for hummingbird pollination as in Tacinga (Taylor et al, 2002) and several Opuntia species (e.g., O. quimilo, Nopalea ; Díaz and Cocucci, 2003; Puente, 2006). However, members of Consolea also demonstrate unique characters, which do not appear elsewhere in the Opuntieae, except in interclade allopolyploids with Consolea (e.g., reticulate epidermis and cryptic dioecy; Strittmatter et al, 2008). Consolea has diversified into at least nine species (Areces‐Mallea, 2001; Negrón‐Ortiz, 2007) and should not be regarded as synonymous with Opuntia s.s., as proposed by Nyffeler and Eggli (2010b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In Cactaceae, the developmental pattern that produces unisexual flowers in C. spinosissima and O. stenopetala has significant differences. In C. spinosissima and five other species of the genus Consolea, male flowers present a well-developed stigma, style and ovary; the female sterility is attributable to ovule abortion (Strittmatter et al 2002(Strittmatter et al , 2008. In contrast, in O. stenopetala the inability of male flowers to set fruits is clearly due to the incomplete ovule development or the total absence of ovules, in combination with the lack of stigma and stylar defects.…”
Section: Sexual Dimorphism In Flower Development In O Stenopetalamentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Most of the previous work on unisexuality has focused on ecological aspects (Del Castillo 1986;Fleming et al 1994) and embryological studies of dioecious species are scarce. In fact, only the subdioecious cactus Consolea spinosissima has been studied at morphological and embryological level (Strittmatter et al 2002(Strittmatter et al , 2008. Natural populations of C. spinosissima display three floral morphs: male, female, and weak hermaphrodite (morphologically hermaphrodite flowers in which ovules at anthesis are papery).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%