Comprehensive Polymer Science and Supplements 1989
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-096701-1.00191-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterochain Block Copolymers*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 230 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present literature already contains a number of valuable reviews [12,13,[18][19][20][21][22] and books [23][24][25] on block copolymer systems. This review aims to compliment them by providing an introduction to block copolymer theory in the context of the simple diblock copolymer melt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present literature already contains a number of valuable reviews [12,13,[18][19][20][21][22] and books [23][24][25] on block copolymer systems. This review aims to compliment them by providing an introduction to block copolymer theory in the context of the simple diblock copolymer melt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These difunctional polymers or oligomers can be used for preparing novel block copolymers (diblock, triblock, and so on) and interesting materials such as amphiphilic oligomers and supramolecules . For these purposes, poly(alkylene glycol)s and terminal-functionalized oligomers from condensation polymers, e.g., polyamides or polyesters, may be used …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the prefix “oxo” denotes the characteristic group “=O” [26–27] and, consequently, “oxocarbenium ion” is a carbenium ion with the group “=O” (i.e., a synonym of an acylium cation, 5 ; Fig. 2), which is the other use found in the literature for this term [23,28]. Not only is the term “oxocarbenium ion” not suitable for describing intermediate 1 , but also it is used to name another intermediate more accurately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%