Heteroaryl Analogues of AMPA. 2. Synthesis, Absolute Stereochemistry, Photochemistry, and Structure−Activity Relationships

Self Cite

We have previously used homologation of (S)-glutamic acid (Glu) and Glu analogs as an approach to the design of selective ligands for different subtypes of Glu receptors. (RS)-2-Amino-3-(3-carboxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolyl)propionic acid (ACPA), which is an isoxazole homolog of Glu, is a very potent agonist at the (RS)-2-amino-3-(3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolyl)propionic acid (AMPA) subgroup of Glu receptors and a moderately potent ligand for the kainic acid (KA) subgroup of Glu receptors. The enantiomers of ACPA were previously obtained by chiral HPLC resolution. Prompted by pharmacological interest in ACPA, we have now prepared the (S)- and (R)-enantiomers of ACPA by stereocontrolled syntheses using (1R,2R,5R)- and (1S,2S,5S)-2-hydroxy-3-pinanone, respectively, as chiral auxiliaries. Furthermore, the 5-ethyl analog of ACPA, Ethyl-ACPA, was synthesized, and (S)- and (R)-Ethyl-ACPA were also prepared using this method. The absolute configurations of (S)- and (R)-ACPA were established by X-ray crystallographic analysis of a protected (1S,2S,5S)-2-hydroxy-3-pinanone imine derivative of (R)-ACPA. The absolute stereochemistry of (S)- and (R)-Ethyl-ACPA was assigned on the basis of a comparison of their properties with those of the enantiomers of ACPA, employing elution order on chiral HPLC columns, as well as circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy in combination with time-dependent density functional theory. The structural and electronic basis for the Cotton effect observed for such analogs is examined. The lower homolog of ACPA, (RS)-2-amino-2-(3-carboxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolyl)acetic acid (1), which is a Glu analog, was also synthesized. Affinities and neuroexcitatory effects were determined using rat brain membranes and cortical wedges, respectively, at native AMPA, KA, and N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptors. The molecular pharmacology of (S)- and (R)-ACPA and (S)- and (R)-Ethyl-ACPA was evaluated at homomeric cloned subtypes of AMPA receptors (iGluR1o,3o,4o) and of KA receptors (iGluR5,6), expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. The cloned receptors mGluR1alpha, mGluR2, and mGluR4a, expressed in CHO cell lines, were used to study the effects of the five compounds at metabotropic Glu receptors. In accordance with ligand-receptor complexes known from X-ray crystallography, the conformationally restricted Glu analog 1 was inactive at all Glu receptors studied, and the R-forms of ACPA and Ethyl-ACPA were very weak or inactive at these receptors. At AMPA receptor subtypes, (S)-ACPA and (S)-Ethyl-ACPA showed equally potent agonist effects at iGluR1o and iGluR3o, whereas (S)-Ethyl-ACPA was 6-fold more potent than (S)-ACPA at iGluR4o. (S)-ACPA and (S)-Ethyl-ACPA were approximately an order of magnitude less potent at iGluR5 than at AMPA receptor subtypes, and neither compound showed detectable effects at iGluR6. The binding mode of (S)-Ethyl-ACPA at iGluR2 was examined by docking to the (S)-ACPA-iGluR2 complex.

Section: Synthesis and Chiral Hplc Analysismentioning

confidence: 70%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Synthesis, theoretical and structural analyses, and enantiopharmacology of 3‐carboxy homologs of AMPA

Brehm¹,

Greenwood²,

Sløk³

et al. 2004

Self Cite

“…[6][7][8] With the exception of the demethylated analog of AMPA (Fig. 1), which shows relatively high AMPA receptor affinity but weak AMPA receptor agonist potency, a good correlation between affinity and agonist potency has been observed for these compounds.…”

Section: -3mentioning

confidence: 85%

“…8,25,38,42 The dual affinities observed for ACPA towards AMPA and KA receptors could not be segregated by the resolution, as the S-enantiomer of ACPA was found to be responsible for both receptor affinities.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Receptors activated by Glu consist of a family of ionotropic Glu (iGlu) receptors and a family of G-proteincoupled metabotropic Glu (mGlu) receptors. The family of iGlu receptors, which mediates fast synaptic transmission through ion channels, is subdivided into three classes of receptors, N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA), (RS)-2-amino-3-(3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolyl)propionic acid (AMPA), and kainic acid (KA) receptors.1,2 Eight mGlu receptor subtypes have been cloned and, based on pharmacology, signal transduction pathway, and sequence homology, these receptor subtypes have been divided into three groups: mGlu 1,5 , mGlu 2,3 , and mGlu 4,6,7,8 . [3][4][5] It is generally agreed that iGlu as well as mGlu receptors play important roles in the healthy and in the diseased CNS and that both receptor families are potential drug targets.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Resolution, configurational assignment, and enantiopharmacology at glutamate receptors of 2‐amino‐3‐(3‐carboxy‐5‐methyl‐4‐isoxazolyl)propionic acid (ACPA) and demethyl‐ACPA

Johansen¹,

Stensbøl²,

Nielsen³

et al. 2001

Self Cite

We have previously described (RS)-2-amino-3-(3-carboxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolyl)propionic acid (ACPA) as a potent agonist at the (RS)-2-amino-3-(3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolyl)propionic acid (AMPA) receptor subtype of (S)-glutamic acid (Glu) receptors. We now report the chromatographic resolution of ACPA and (RS)-2-amino-3-(3-carboxy-4-isoxazolyl)propionic acid (demethyl-ACPA) using a Sumichiral OA-5000 column. The configuration of the enantiomers of both compounds have been assigned based on X-ray crystallographic analyses, supported by circular dichroism spectra and elution orders on chiral HPLC columns. Furthermore, the enantiopharmacology of ACPA and demethyl-ACPA was investigated using radioligand binding and cortical wedge electrophysiological assay systems and cloned metabotropic Glu receptors. (S)-ACPA showed high affinity in AMPA binding (IC(50) = 0.025 microM), low affinity in kainic acid binding (IC(50) = 3.6 microM), and potent AMPA receptor agonist activity on cortical neurons (EC(50) = 0.25 microM), whereas (R)-ACPA was essentially inactive. Like (S)-ACPA, (S)-demethyl-ACPA displayed high AMPA receptor affinity (IC(50) = 0.039 microM), but was found to be a relatively weak AMPA receptor agonist (EC(50) = 12 microM). The stereoselectivity observed for demethyl-ACPA was high when based on AMPA receptor affinity (eudismic ratio = 250), but low when based on electrophysiological activity (eudismic ratio = 10). (R)-Demethyl-ACPA also possessed a weak NMDA receptor antagonist activity (IC(50) = 220 microM). Among the enantiomers tested, only (S)-demethyl-ACPA showed activity at metabotropic receptors, being a weak antagonist at the mGlu(2) receptor subtype (K(B) = 148 microM).

Resolution, configurational assignment, and enantiopharmacology of 2-amino-3-[3-hydroxy-5-(2-methyl-2H-tetrazol-5-yl)isoxazol-4-yl]propionic acid, a potent GluR3- and GluR4-preferring AMPA receptor agonist

Vogensen¹,

Jensen

Stensbøl³

et al. 2000

Self Cite

We have previously shown that (RS)-2-amino-3-[3-hydroxy-5-(2-methyl-2H-tetrazol-5-yl)isoxazol -4-yl] propionic acid (2-Me-Tet-AMPA) is a selective agonist at (RS)-2-amino-3-(3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazol-4-yl)propionic acid (AMPA) receptors, markedly more potent than AMPA itself, whereas the isomeric compound 1-Me-Tet-AMPA is essentially inactive. We here report the enantiopharmacology of 2-Me-Tet-AMPA in radioligand binding and cortical wedge electrophysiological assay systems, and using cloned AMPA (GluR1-4) and kainic acid (KA) (GluR5, 6, and KA2) receptor subtypes expressed in Xenopus oocytes. 2-Me-Tet-AMPA was resolved using preparative chiral HPLC. Zwitterion (-)-2-Me-Tet-AMPA was assigned the (R)-configuration based on an X-ray crystallographic analysis supported by the elution order of (-)- and (+)-2-Me-Tet-AMPA using four different chiral HPLC columns and by circular dichroism spectra. None of the compounds tested showed detectable affinity for N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor sites, and (R)-2-Me-Tet-AMPA was essentially inactive in all of the test systems used. Whereas (S)-2-Me-Tet-AMPA showed low affinity (IC(50) = 11 microM) in the [(3)H]KA binding assay, it was significantly more potent (IC(50) = 0.009 microM) than AMPA (IC(50) = 0.039 microM) in the [(3)H]AMPA binding assay, and in agreement with these findings, (S)-2-Me-Tet-AMPA (EC(50) = 0.11 microM) was markedly more potent than AMPA (EC(50) = 3.5 microM) in the electrophysiological cortical wedge model. In contrast to AMPA, which showed comparable potencies (EC(50) = 1.3-3.5 microM) at receptors formed by the AMPA receptor subunits (GluR1-4) in Xenopus oocytes, more potent effects and a substantially higher degree of subunit selectivity were observed for (S)-2-Me-Tet-AMPA: GluR1o (EC(50) = 0.16 microM), GluR1o/GluR2i (EC(50) = 0.12 microM), GluR3o (EC(50) = 0.014 microM) and GluR4o (EC(50) = 0.009 microM). At the KA-preferring receptors GluR5 and GluR6/KA2, (S)-2-Me-Tet-AMPA showed much weaker agonist effects (EC(50) = 8.7 and 15.3 microM, respectively). It is concluded that (S)-2-Me-Tet-AMPA is a subunit-selective and highly potent AMPA receptor agonist and a potentially useful tool for studies of physiological AMPA receptor subtypes.