Het verband tussen angst bij de moeder in de prenatale periode en zelfregulatie in de adolescentie

Mennes, Maarten

doi:10.1007/bf03060972

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Developing regulatory mechanisms is a major developmental task during infancy (Bell & Deater‐Deckard, 2007). Regulatory capacity is defined “as processes that serve to modulate reactivity” (Rothbart et al., 2011, p. 442), allowing the infant to manifest adequate behaviors and to appropriately respond to environmental demands, in accordance with his/her age and reactivity (van den Bergh & Mennes, 2006). Self‐regulating mechanisms include orienting of attention, inhibition, soothability, and the effortful control of behavior based on the executive attention system (Rothbart et al., 1992, 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is lower fetal heart rate variability a susceptibility marker to the impact of negative coparenting on infant regulatory capacity?

Pinto,

Figueiredo

2024

Infant Mental Health Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lower fetal heart rate variability (FHRV) may be a prenatal endophenotypic susceptibility marker and increase the impact of both positive and negative coparenting on infant regulatory capacity. This study analyzed the moderator role of FHRV in the association between positive and negative coparenting and infant regulatory capacity at 3 months. The sample comprised 86 first‐born infants and their mothers and fathers recruited at a public Health Service in Northern Portugal. FHRV was recorded during routine cardiotocography examination at the third trimester of gestation. Mothers and fathers reported on coparenting and infant regulatory capacity at 2 weeks and 3 months postpartum. FHRV moderated the association between mother's and father's negative coparenting at 2 weeks postpartum and infant regulatory capacity at three months. Infants with low FHRV presented higher regulatory capacity when mothers or fathers reported less negative coparenting, while lower regulatory capacity when mothers or fathers reported more negative coparenting, than infants with high FHRV. Findings suggested lower FHRV as a prenatal endophenotypic susceptibility marker that increases the impact of negative coparenting on infant regulatory capacity.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is lower fetal heart rate variability a susceptibility marker to the impact of negative coparenting on infant regulatory capacity?

Pinto,

Figueiredo

2024

Infant Mental Health Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Self‐regulation results from the activity of “processes that serve to modulate reactivity” (Rothbart et al, 2011, p. 442) and grants adequate behaviours and appropriate responses to situational demands (van den Bergh & Mennes, 2006). Self‐regulating processes vary according to the infant's age and reactivity pattern and include orienting, fearful inhibition, angry attack, surgent or extraverted approach, and behaviour control the effort based on the executive attention system (Rothbart et al, 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measures of infant self‐regulation during the first year of life: A systematic review

Pinto

Figueiredo

2023

Infant and Child Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to systematically review the measures used to assess infant self‐regulation during the first 12 months of life. This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis statement protocol. From 235 selected papers, 79 provided information on behavioural and physiological measures to assess infant self‐regulation during the first 12 months of life. Thirty‐six behavioural (30 observational and 6 parent‐report) and five physiological different measures were identified. Studies with a longitudinal design, comprising larger samples, and aiming to assess infant self‐regulation later in infancy, mostly used behavioural measures than physiological measures. Studies comprising lower samples and aiming to assess infant self‐regulation earlier in infancy, mostly used observational than parent‐reported measures. Studies targeting younger infants used physiological measures and studies targeting older infants used behavioural measures, with observational measures used with younger infants and parental‐reported measures used with older infants during the first year of life. When measuring self‐regulation is important to consider infant's age, to fit the measurement procedures with the self‐regulation development level.

show abstract

“…Developing regulatory capacity is a major developmental task during infancy (Bell & Deater‐Deckard, 2007), with a major role in further infant mental health and development (Eisenberg et al., 2004; Perry et al., 2016; Williams et al., 2016). According to Rothbart's conceptual approach to temperament and self‐regulation, regulatory capacity is defined “as processes that serve to modulate reactivity” (Rothbart et al., 2011, p. 442), allowing the infant to manifest adequate behaviors and to appropriately respond to environmental demands, in accordance with his/her age and reactivity (van den Bergh & Mennes, 2006). Regulatory capacity is closely linked to temperament and reactivity and is important to the development of resilience (Putnam & Stifter, 2008; Rothbart et al., 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Positive coparenting previous to the COVID‐19 pandemic can buffer regulatory problems in infants facing the COVID‐19 pandemic

Pinto,

Figueiredo

2023

Infancy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Coparenting can be a development‐enhancing or risk‐promoting environment for infant regulatory capacity, mainly in the presence of adversity. This study aimed to analyze the association between positive and negative coparenting previous to the COVID‐19 pandemic and infant regulatory capacity in the presence of the COVID‐19 pandemic, an adverse condition. A sample of 71 first‐born infants and their mothers and fathers from a longitudinal cohort in Portugal were assessed at 2 weeks postpartum before the COVID‐19 pandemic and again at 6 months postpartum, before (n = 35) or during the COVID‐19 pandemic (n = 36). Parents completed measures of positive and negative coparenting and infant regulatory capacity in both assessment waves. Results revealed that the presence of the COVID‐19 pandemic moderates the association between mothers' and fathers' positive coparenting previous to the COVID‐19 pandemic and infant regulatory capacity at 6 months. The association between positive coparenting and regulatory capacity was stronger in infants facing the COVID‐19 pandemic, than in infants who did not face the COVID‐19 pandemic. Positive coparenting previous to the COVID‐19 pandemic may be a development‐enhancing environment for infant regulatory capacity in the presence of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Positive coparenting may buffer regulatory problems in infants facing adverse conditions.

show abstract

Het verband tussen angst bij de moeder in de prenatale periode en zelfregulatie in de adolescentie

Cited by 4 publications

References 19 publications

Is lower fetal heart rate variability a susceptibility marker to the impact of negative coparenting on infant regulatory capacity?

Is lower fetal heart rate variability a susceptibility marker to the impact of negative coparenting on infant regulatory capacity?

Measures of infant self‐regulation during the first year of life: A systematic review

Positive coparenting previous to the COVID‐19 pandemic can buffer regulatory problems in infants facing the COVID‐19 pandemic

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About