2002
DOI: 10.1097/01241398-200207000-00012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Herring Classification: How Useful Is the Initial Radiograph?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Lappin et al [11] reported that 92 (33%) of 275 patients who were managed conservatively in several hospitals showed changes in their LP grades during their treatment periods [12]. Our result was consistent with the results reported by Lappin et al [11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lappin et al [11] reported that 92 (33%) of 275 patients who were managed conservatively in several hospitals showed changes in their LP grades during their treatment periods [12]. Our result was consistent with the results reported by Lappin et al [11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…This classification has thus been widely used in clinical practice, but it usually assesses patients at the fragmentation stage of disease, rather than at the initial examination. In addition, Lappin et al [11] reported that the LP classification grade might change during the course of treatment. Therefore, an evaluation of the initial radiographic findings according to the LP classification may not correlate with those of the final outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Herring classification has been widely accepted because of its simplicity and reproducibility. However, Lappin et al [9] have suggested that the Herring grade changes with time, especially in the early stages of the disease. We therefore decided to classify our patient's with both the Catterall and the Herring classifications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lateral pillar and the Catterall classification systems can only be applied after significant femoral head deformity occurs. [4][5][6][7] Ideally, a prognosticator that can be applied before this occurs would be optimal in guiding treatment decisions. The extent of subchondral fracture in the early stage of fragmentation has also been assessed for its prognostic value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early application of these classifications has been shown to lead to incorrect assignment and prognostication in some patients. 6,7 Clearly, there is a need to develop a prognosticator that can be applied at early stages of LCPD before development of significant deformity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%