Heroes of the developing world? Emerging powers in WTO agriculture negotiations and dispute settlement

Abstract

Agriculture has been a key issue of North-South struggle at the WTO. Emerging powers like China, India and Brazil have portrayed themselves as leaders of the Global South, crusading to make the trading system fairer for developing countries. This article analyzes three casesthe cotton dispute, subsidies and public stockholdingthat have been at the center of WTO negotiations and dispute settlement on agriculture since the collapse of the Doha Round. While presenting themselves as champions of the developing world, I show that the emerging powers have been advancing their own interests, often at the expense of other developing countries..

From Developing Country Leader to Flexible Negotiator: New Directions in Brazilian Trade Strategy

“…This contrasts with interests-based analyses that reserve a more marginal role for leadership in Brazilian international relations: ‘[A]lthough the identity of some actors may have changed, the same logic of power politics that has long characterized the WTO persists’ (Hopewell, 2021, 20). Beyond status considerations, this article consequently provides a clearer picture of Brazilian coalition building.…”

“…Depictions of leadership and the maintenance of followership as the primary drivers of Brazilian trade strategy (Doctor, 2015), however, require updating. As Hopewell (2021) argues, while Brazilian diplomats have been quick to construct images of Brazil as a hero of the developing world – and this has (previously) resulted in greater prestige and bargaining power – the actions of Brazil and other emerging economies have often not helped developing countries more generally. Instead of leadership as an end in itself, the narrow pursuit of trade interests, disproportionately in agriculture, characterizes Brazilian trade strategy, with developing country leadership acting as a useful legitimacy tool (Hopewell, 2021).…”

“…Brazil won both cases in 2005, thus marking the first time that a developing country had been successful in agricultural dispute settlement against an industrialized actor. This in turn allowed Brazil to 'construct a David-and-Goliath-like image of itself, as a hero of the developing world taking on the traditional powers' (Hopewell, 2013(Hopewell, , 2021.…”

Teaching and research of International Law in an expanded world: understanding from the Indian perspective

“…95 against the notion of "rise of rest", 97 by arguing whether it is the rest or a handful few? 98 Be that as it may, it is beyond dispute that diverse participation in global institutes helps in its greater acceptance. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan opined the "need is to treat world as a unit" 99 Therefore, rather than focusing on fragmentation of international law, perceived as a "threat to its perceived virtues of unifying humankind to achieve order and justice", focus must be towards attaining unity, which is "based on solidarity that understands the alienation and pain of victims of fragmented international law."…”

Shock and Awe in the UNFSS

“…This motive became clear when Brazil, India and China challenged the hypocrisy of US/EU farm protections in violating WTO rules for agricultural liberalization. Their challenge was to Western power rather than the WTO's neoliberal paradigm of market rule (Hopewell 2021) producing a multi-polar agro-food system.…”