Hermite–Hadamard integral inequalities on coordinated convex functions in quantum calculus

Abstract

At first, we recall the q-operators in the context of q-calculus and by examining these operators we will introduce new definitions of the partial q-operators. Then, we investigate some new refinements inequalities of Hermite–Hadamard ($H-H$ H − H ) type on the coordinated convex functions involving the new defined partial q-operators. From our main results, we establish several specific inequalities and we point out the existing results which had already been obtained in the literature.

Fractional Integral Inequalities for Exponentially Nonconvex Functions and Their Applications

“…Upon summing the inequality (25) over i from 0 to n − 1 and using the property of the modulus, we obtain inequality (24). Proposition 2.…”

“…The two-sided inequality (1) has become a very important foundation within the field of mathematical analysis and optimization. Several applications of inequalities of this type have been derived in a number of different settings (see [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]).…”

Symmetric Quantum Inequalities on Finite Rectangular Plane

“…In the recent past, a number of publications have been presented regarding the improvement and development of different variants of the quantum Hermite-Hadamard and related inequalities (see [17][18][19][20], and references therein). However, in the present article we are interested in exploring such findings under the new and latest perspective of symmetric quantum calculus.…”

Enlarged integral inequalities through recent fractional generalized operators

“…This drives the need for more exact inequalities when working with fractional calculus-based mathematical models. In the existing modification of a certain study, we concentrate on the most prominent Hermite-Hadamard-type inequality [2,8]. Because of the nature of its definition, convexity is crucial in analyzing inequality for convex functions; for other classes of convex functions and attributes; see [5,15,16,19,20,25,26].…”