2008
DOI: 10.1097/fbp.0b013e32831c3b2b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heritable strain differences in sensitivity to the startle gating-disruptive effects of D2 but not D3 receptor stimulation

Abstract: Prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex (PPI) is an operational measure of sensorimotor gating that is deficient in several brain disorders and is disrupted in rats by dopamine agonists. There are robust heritable strain differences between Sprague Dawley (SD) and Long Evans (LE) strains in the sensitivity to the PPI-disruptive effects of dopamine agonists associated with differential gene expression in the nucleus accumbens. Here we compared the contribution of D2 vs. D3 receptors to this heritable differen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The A 2A antagonists SCH 412348 (Figure 2(a)) and istradefylline (Figure 2(b)) did not impair rat PPI (SCH 412348: F (3, 28) = 0.57, P > 0.05; istradefylline: F (3, 28) = 1.18, P > 0.05) or startle magnitude (SCH 412348: F (3, 28) = 0.31, P > 0.05; istradefylline: F (3, 28) = 0.20, P > 0.05) at any doses tested. Pramipexole (Figure 2(c)) significantly reduced PPI at all doses tested (0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg) ( F (3, 60) = 4.47, P < 0.01) but also significantly reduced startle magnitude at all doses tested ( F (3, 60) = 5.24, P < 0.01) compared to vehicle, which is consistent with previous findings [11]. Pergolide (Figure 2(d)) impaired PPI at 0.3 and 3 mg/kg ( F (3, 60) = 5.64, P < 0.01) but did not affect startle ( F (3, 60) = 1.29, P > 0.05).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The A 2A antagonists SCH 412348 (Figure 2(a)) and istradefylline (Figure 2(b)) did not impair rat PPI (SCH 412348: F (3, 28) = 0.57, P > 0.05; istradefylline: F (3, 28) = 1.18, P > 0.05) or startle magnitude (SCH 412348: F (3, 28) = 0.31, P > 0.05; istradefylline: F (3, 28) = 0.20, P > 0.05) at any doses tested. Pramipexole (Figure 2(c)) significantly reduced PPI at all doses tested (0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg) ( F (3, 60) = 4.47, P < 0.01) but also significantly reduced startle magnitude at all doses tested ( F (3, 60) = 5.24, P < 0.01) compared to vehicle, which is consistent with previous findings [11]. Pergolide (Figure 2(d)) impaired PPI at 0.3 and 3 mg/kg ( F (3, 60) = 5.64, P < 0.01) but did not affect startle ( F (3, 60) = 1.29, P > 0.05).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…4d). To assess the impact of the startle-modulating effects of drugs on PPI, a separate analysis was conducted for subsets of animals that were constructed by eliminating the extreme responders, such as the effects of drugs on startle were balanced between the various groups (Weber et al 2008). Mean startle amplitudes were then as follows: saline (n=8)=120±4, MK-801 (n=6)=151±38, MK-801 + haloperidol (n=10)=149±22, MK-801 + BF2-649 (n=7)= 162±34, and MK-801 + haloperidol + BF2-649 (n=8)= 148±19 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2B). As in previous studies (Chang et al, 2010b; Swerdlow et al, 2009; Weber et al 2008, 2009), to understand the relationship between the startle- and PPI-reducing effects of (S)-PPX, difference scores were calculated between startle magnitude after vehicle and after active drug doses, and an ANOVA was conducted with a median split of these difference scores in each stereoisomer group. The PPI-disruptive effects of PPX did not differ among groups that exhibited high vs. low PPX-induced startle reduction (F<1), nor was there a median split × stereoisomer interaction (F<1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous reports of the ability of PPX to disrupt PPI in rats (Weber et al, 2008, 2009; Chang et al, 2010b, 2011; Swerdlow et al, 2009) were based on the assumption that these effects were mediated by interactions between PPX and DA receptors in the forebrain. However, PPX is bioactive in other ways; it has been shown to be neuroprotective in neurodegenerative models using MPTP, apparently through DA-dependent and DA-independent mechanisms (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation