2015
DOI: 10.1214/15-ejs1069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heritability estimation in high dimensional sparse linear mixed models

Abstract: Motivated by applications in genetic fields, we propose to estimate the heritability in high dimensional sparse linear mixed models. The heritability determines how the variance is shared between the different random components of a linear mixed model. The main novelty of our approach is to consider that the random effects can be sparse, that is may contain null components, but we do not know neither their proportion nor their positions. The estimator that we consider is strongly inspired by the one proposed b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…from Bonnet et al . (): that is why we choose here to compare EstHer with HiLMM and not with GCTA. We also compare these results with the software GEMMA that is described in Zhou and Stephens ().…”
Section: Results After Applying the Decision Criterion And Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…from Bonnet et al . (): that is why we choose here to compare EstHer with HiLMM and not with GCTA. We also compare these results with the software GEMMA that is described in Zhou and Stephens ().…”
Section: Results After Applying the Decision Criterion And Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results that we obtained in Bonnet et al . () suggest the following. If we knew the set of causal SNPs, then, considering only this (small) subset in the genetic information matrix, we would obtain with HiLMM an estimator having a smaller standard error than when using all SNPs in the genetic information matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations