2013
DOI: 10.1111/jce.12289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

hERG Inhibitors with Similar Potency But Different Binding Kinetics Do Not Pose the Same Proarrhythmic Risk: Implications for Drug Safety Assessment

Abstract: Our study demonstrates the need for screening for hERG binding configurations rather than potency alone. It also demonstrates the potential link between hERG, drug mode of action and TdP, and the need to question the current regulatory guidance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(58 reference statements)
3
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2b). Simulations of LQTS2 in the cable produced a slurred upstroke for the T wave but did not produce notching, consistent with previous observations from ourselves as well as other groups [20][21][22] . When we extended our simulations to the whole ventricle, which included cellular heterogeneity and details of tissue architecture (see Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…2b). Simulations of LQTS2 in the cable produced a slurred upstroke for the T wave but did not produce notching, consistent with previous observations from ourselves as well as other groups [20][21][22] . When we extended our simulations to the whole ventricle, which included cellular heterogeneity and details of tissue architecture (see Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…10,11 Dofetilide and cisapride have vastly different unbinding rates because of the tendency of dofetilide but not cisapride to be trapped within the hERG channel. 12 Although it has been shown theoretically that trapped drugs may have more proarrhythmia liability compared with nontrapped drugs with similar hERG-blocking potency, 13,14 no attempt has been made to classify TdP risk using experimentally derived data on drug-channel interactions in an in silico model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When considering drugs with an even lower affinity than clozapine and so faster time constants of unblock, then it may not be possible to get accurate estimates of the fast components unless we explicitly include a drug diffusion term in the model. It is widely accepted that an understanding of the kinetics of drug interactions with the K v 11.1 channel is fundamental to our insight into the proarrhythmic propensity of these drugs (Di Veroli et al, 2013a). In this study, we have provided the first direct measurement of the kinetics of drug binding to unbinding from K v 11.1 channels at high temporal resolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%