2005
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-05-07997-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hereditary topological diagonalizations and the Menger-Hurewicz Conjectures

Abstract: We consider the question, which of the major classes defined by topological diagonalizations of open or Borel covers is hereditary. Many of the classes in the open case are not hereditary already in ZFC, and none of them is provably hereditary. This is contrasted with the Borel case, where some of the classes are provably hereditary. Two of the examples are counter-examples of sizes d and b, respectively, to the Menger and Hurewicz Conjectures, and one of them answers a question of Steprans on perfectly meager… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

7
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If a subset of N N is unbounded with respect to ≤ * , then we simply say that it is unbounded. Let b (respectively, d) denote the minimal cardinality of an unbounded (respectively, dominating) subset of N N. We use the following setting from [5]. Let N = N ∪ {∞} be the one point compactification of N.…”
Section: Two Almost σ-Compact Subgroups Of Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If a subset of N N is unbounded with respect to ≤ * , then we simply say that it is unbounded. Let b (respectively, d) denote the minimal cardinality of an unbounded (respectively, dominating) subset of N N. We use the following setting from [5]. Let N = N ∪ {∞} be the one point compactification of N.…”
Section: Two Almost σ-Compact Subgroups Of Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By Lemma 24 and the induction hypothesis, S k ∩ N is contained in a union of less than b many sets satisfying S 1 (B Γ , B Γ ). In [4, full version] it is shown that S 1 (B Γ , B Γ ) is preserved under taking unions of size less than b, and in [5] it is shown that S 1 (B Γ , B Γ ) is preserved under taking subsets. This proves the assertion.…”
Section: Lemma 22 S 1 (B ω B γ ) Is Preserved Under Taking Countabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our construction is essentially due to [4,Theorem 16]. Let D = {f α : α < d} be a dominating subset of ω ω which satisfies the condition (*): for…”
Section: Corollary 36 If X Is a Lusin Set Or A Sierpiński Set Thenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every σ-compact space satisfies U fin (O, Γ), but the converse fails [7,2]. Let A and B be any two families.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%