2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11888-007-0010-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer: Revised Bethesda criteria, immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability, germline analysis, and emerging issues in genetic testing

Abstract: Clinical criteria aid in the decision to pursue genetic testing for suspected cases of hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) and continue to be refined. Sequence analysis offers the greatest opportunity for definitive germline mutation testing; however, prescreening through microsatellite instability and/or immunohistochemistry offers a cost effective alternative, and recent studies suggest both are complementary. BRAF mutations and hMLH1 promoter methylation appear to have negative predictive value for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(6 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…123 However, IHC cannot differentiate between loss of MLH1 expression caused by a germline mutation versus somatic hypermethylation. 78 Also, some germline missense mutations may be erroneously interpreted as normal by IHC, because they may result in an antigenically intact but nonfunctional protein. 78,124,125 The advantage of MSI is that some studies have shown it to be somewhat more sensitive at detecting patients with germline MMR defects than IHC.…”
Section: Microsatellite Instability and Immunohistochemistry Testing mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…123 However, IHC cannot differentiate between loss of MLH1 expression caused by a germline mutation versus somatic hypermethylation. 78 Also, some germline missense mutations may be erroneously interpreted as normal by IHC, because they may result in an antigenically intact but nonfunctional protein. 78,124,125 The advantage of MSI is that some studies have shown it to be somewhat more sensitive at detecting patients with germline MMR defects than IHC.…”
Section: Microsatellite Instability and Immunohistochemistry Testing mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…78 Also, some germline missense mutations may be erroneously interpreted as normal by IHC, because they may result in an antigenically intact but nonfunctional protein. 78,124,125 The advantage of MSI is that some studies have shown it to be somewhat more sensitive at detecting patients with germline MMR defects than IHC. 121,122,[126][127][128][129][130][131][132] Vasen et al 123 found in their review of prospective studies looking at the sensitivity of MSI versus IHC that MSI was indeed more sensitive than IHC (98% vs 94%, respectively).…”
Section: Microsatellite Instability and Immunohistochemistry Testing mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations