1993
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.43.9.1741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hereditary congenital nystagmus and gaze‐holding failure

Abstract: Congenital nystagmus (CN) may be due to an instability of the neural integrator responsible for gaze holding. This longitudinal study tests that hypothesis, investigates the saccadic instabilities of relatives, and assesses the effects of afferent stimulation on both the CN and the coexisting gaze-holding failure. We recorded four siblings who had CN and gaze-holding failure while fixating in primary position and lateral gaze. In lateral gaze, the CN waveforms were superimposed on the centripetal drift caused … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reasons for incomplete penetrance among female carriers include patterns of skewed X inactivation, interactions with other genes, and nongenetic, developmental influences on oculomotor development. In some instances, unaffected relatives, who do not manifest nystagmus, may nevertheless have subclinical eye movement abnormalities demonstrated by sensitive recording techniques (Dell'Osso et al 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reasons for incomplete penetrance among female carriers include patterns of skewed X inactivation, interactions with other genes, and nongenetic, developmental influences on oculomotor development. In some instances, unaffected relatives, who do not manifest nystagmus, may nevertheless have subclinical eye movement abnormalities demonstrated by sensitive recording techniques (Dell'Osso et al 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subtle eye movement abnormalities have been detected among apparently unaffected relatives of CIN patients (Dell'Osso & Weissman, 1993;Shallo-Hoffmann & Watermeier, 1988) and it is also known that nystagmus waveform and phenotype may vary significantly, not only within pedigrees but even monozygotic twins with CIN. (Abadi & Dickinson, 1983;Spooner & Bateman, 1986) This may be of considerable importance for linkage projects using these CIN pedigrees where phenotypic variations may lead to errors in assigning affected/non-affected status.…”
Section: X-linked Cinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are good reasons for this: (1) there is a high frequency of afferent visual-pathway dysfunctions; (2) CN damping by use of contact lenses and cutaneous stimulation of the trigeminal nerve; (3) the presence of a null zone; (4) neurological origin of acquired nystagmus in adults; and (5) requirement of a functioning geniculostriate system for the development of horizontal CN. Several proposed mechanisms behind CIN have been suggested but are currently out of favor; these include the presence of a leaky neural integrator (Dell'Osso et al, 1993), misdirection of the retinogeniculate or subcortical visual pathway (Fielder and Evans 1988), and albinolike abnormal chiasmatic decussation of the optic axons (Apkarian & Shallo-Hoffman, 1991).…”
Section: Candidate Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in IIN, other than reduced visual acuity and an abnormal optokinetic response (9,10), no overt ocular abnormality has been described. This has led to a number of mathematical models suggesting that infantile nystagmus arises due to the instability of the neural integrator (11,12) or the smooth pursuit system (13), rather than an afferent defect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%