2010
DOI: 10.1016/s1548-5315(11)70558-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer testing: integration and outcomes within community oncology practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the inception of genetic testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer, over 800,000 individuals have been tested for mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes (Myriad Genetics, personal communication, July 2012) and the annual number of tested individuals is rising. A recent study of community oncology practices found that 41 % of patients had sufficient risk factors to merit testing of deleterious BRCA1/ 2 mutations (Eisenbraun et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the inception of genetic testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer, over 800,000 individuals have been tested for mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes (Myriad Genetics, personal communication, July 2012) and the annual number of tested individuals is rising. A recent study of community oncology practices found that 41 % of patients had sufficient risk factors to merit testing of deleterious BRCA1/ 2 mutations (Eisenbraun et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, Myriad's general approach to ‘calling' VUS results is described, but neither analytic algorithms nor underlying sequence data are available. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 This contrasts with recommendations of the National Academies in two reports that call for depositing data and methods sufficient for replication and interpretation. 14, 15 …”
Section: Data-sharing Practicesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In an environment in which new technologies, including whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing, are already beginning to change clinical practices in genetic testing, 9, 10, 11 a proprietary database gives Myriad indefinite exclusivity independent of patent protection. Even if Myriad's patents are invalidated (for a summary of the ongoing court challenge, see Supplementary materials), or new alternative testing technologies do not infringe them, until the data and interpretive algorithms are re-created in publicly accessible form, competing services will be able to manage VUS results in only two ways: by having samples analyzed at Myriad, where it is interpreted in light of Myriad's proprietary database, or by rendering inadequate interpretations based upon incomplete public data and algorithms.…”
Section: Interpreting Variants Of Unknown Significancementioning
confidence: 99%