1976
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330440310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hereditary and environmental determinants of growth in height in a longitudinal sample of children and youth of Guatemalan and European ancestry

Abstract: The effects of hereditary and environmental factors upon the growth in stature of children living in Guatemala City has been studied. Heights at yearly examinations were fitted, by individual, to a double logistic curve in samples of Guatemalan and European children attending a private school in Guatemala City. These two samples differed genetically yet shared the same environment. Their growth was compared, by a multivariate analysis of the parameterized curves, to that of children from the Berkeley Growth St… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that in a relatively well-nourished population, such as USA cohort, it may only be among the shortest category that there are individuals who have experienced nutritional restriction during growth suffi cient to affect both their ultimate stature and their future risk of cancer. The greater effect of stature on cancer observed in men compared with women is consistent with evidence suggesting increased sensitivity of stature to environmental influences in boys compared with girls [45,90], In addition, there was a stronger association in the leg length component of stature, compared with sitting height. Leg length is also more sensitive to environmental influences than sitting height, especially during adoles cence [90],…”
Section: Adult Anthropometry and Chronic Diseasessupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that in a relatively well-nourished population, such as USA cohort, it may only be among the shortest category that there are individuals who have experienced nutritional restriction during growth suffi cient to affect both their ultimate stature and their future risk of cancer. The greater effect of stature on cancer observed in men compared with women is consistent with evidence suggesting increased sensitivity of stature to environmental influences in boys compared with girls [45,90], In addition, there was a stronger association in the leg length component of stature, compared with sitting height. Leg length is also more sensitive to environmental influences than sitting height, especially during adoles cence [90],…”
Section: Adult Anthropometry and Chronic Diseasessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The greater effect of stature on cancer observed in men compared with women is consistent with evidence suggesting increased sensitivity of stature to environmental influences in boys compared with girls [45,90], In addition, there was a stronger association in the leg length component of stature, compared with sitting height. Leg length is also more sensitive to environmental influences than sitting height, especially during adoles cence [90],…”
Section: Adult Anthropometry and Chronic Diseasessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The decrease of the effect of the season of birth with age is most probably related to an increasing role of genetic regulation of growth during adolescence (Johnston et al, 1975). This genetically programmed growth is not season related and thus tends to erase earlier responses to environmental stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particular factors seem to play various roles at different times during ontogeny. It has been postulated (Johnston et al, 1975) that environmental influences are responsible for a larger share of total phenotypic variance during prepubertal years than during adolescence, when genetic polymorphism becomes more important.Human ada tation can be described as ment, long-term irreversible ecosensitive responses of individuals, and short-term reversible adjustments of organisms. The importance for the understanding o P human non ofgrowth is erroneously terme i a "nutrioccurring at t K ree levels: genetic endowgenetic level is that of evolutionary adaptation; the reversible adjustments fall mainly into the realm of physiolo (Strzalko et al,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distances and velocities of growth in height and weight of high SES Ladino children, from the same population represented in the present study (but different individuals), have been analyzed previously (Johnston et al, 1973(Johnston et al, , 1976Bogin andMacVean, 1978,1983). Compared with similarly privileged children living i n North America or Europe, wealthy Guatemalan children have somewhat slower rates of growth in height during the preadolescent years but comparable growth rates during adolescence in terms of both age at onset of the adolescent growth spurt and the magnitude of peak growth velocity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%