1962
DOI: 10.1021/jf60122a003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Herbicide Residues, Separation and Colorimetric Determination of Monuron and Diuron Residues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

1965
1965
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both 3-chloroaniline and chloride ion determinations were made daily. The 3-chloroaniline content of the perfusate was determined according to the procedure of Pease (1962); chloride ion determinations were made by the procedure of Iwasaki, Utsumi, and Ozawa (1952). After the initial lag phase and degradation period, a second application of the chemical was made to the perfused soils.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both 3-chloroaniline and chloride ion determinations were made daily. The 3-chloroaniline content of the perfusate was determined according to the procedure of Pease (1962); chloride ion determinations were made by the procedure of Iwasaki, Utsumi, and Ozawa (1952). After the initial lag phase and degradation period, a second application of the chemical was made to the perfused soils.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both PCMC and carbaryl proved to be strong inhibitors of the propanil hydrolyzing enzyme (Table 11). The reaction was terminated by the addition of the reagents necessary for DCA determination (Pease, 1962). insecticide under current investigation for use in rice soil, was not a strong inhibitor of this enzyme system. The reaction was terminated by the addition of the reagents necessary for DCA determination (Pease, 1962). insecticide under current investigation for use in rice soil, was not a strong inhibitor of this enzyme system.…”
Section: Results a N D Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein purity was assessed by means of 10% SDS-PAGE and Lumitein Protein gel staining (Biotium). To assess the linuron amidohydrolase activity of the different fractions at each purification step, first the production of DCA from linuron was measured using a colorimetric assay consisting of a diazotization-coupling reaction that detects DCA and measurement of absorption at 500 nm according to the method of Pease (7). Then, the activity was checked and quantified by monitoring the degradation of linuron and production of DCA by HPLC as described above.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%