2006
DOI: 10.2111/05-051r2.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Herbaceous Vegetation Responses (1992–2004) to Restoration Treatments in a Ponderosa Pine Forest

Abstract: Ecological restoration treatments are widely applied in southwestern ponderosa pine forests to convert them to an open canopy structure similar to that found at the time of Euro-American settlement. An experiment was initiated in northern Arizona in 1994 to evaluate long-term ecosystem responses to 3 restoration treatments: 1) thinning from below (thinning), 2) thinning from below plus forest floor manipulation with periodic prescribed burning (composite), and 3) an untreated control. Results focus on total he… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
97
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
8
97
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed opposite responses by tassel-eared squirrels and golden-mantled ground squirrels, as the former is associated with mature pine trees for nesting and foraging (Patton 1977), while the latter uses open meadow-like habitat (Bartels and Thompson 1993); and by woodrats and voles, as woodrats are associated with shrub cover and down wood (Block et al 2005), while voles use meadow-like understory (Bagne and Finch 2009). Overall, six species responded positively to the disturbance event, which is logical given that ponderosa pine forests and its species historically experienced the natural disturbance of fire every 2-20 years (Covington and Moore 1994), and thinning and fire can effect some habitat features (i.e., understory production) in similar ways (Moore et al 2006, Schwilk et al 2009). Two species responded negatively to thinning, including woodrats, which probably experienced a lack of cover at the thinned sites, and pocket gophers, which may have been negatively affected by the soil compaction associated with thinning.…”
Section: Community Structural Responses To Disturbancementioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We observed opposite responses by tassel-eared squirrels and golden-mantled ground squirrels, as the former is associated with mature pine trees for nesting and foraging (Patton 1977), while the latter uses open meadow-like habitat (Bartels and Thompson 1993); and by woodrats and voles, as woodrats are associated with shrub cover and down wood (Block et al 2005), while voles use meadow-like understory (Bagne and Finch 2009). Overall, six species responded positively to the disturbance event, which is logical given that ponderosa pine forests and its species historically experienced the natural disturbance of fire every 2-20 years (Covington and Moore 1994), and thinning and fire can effect some habitat features (i.e., understory production) in similar ways (Moore et al 2006, Schwilk et al 2009). Two species responded negatively to thinning, including woodrats, which probably experienced a lack of cover at the thinned sites, and pocket gophers, which may have been negatively affected by the soil compaction associated with thinning.…”
Section: Community Structural Responses To Disturbancementioning
confidence: 87%
“…Following thinning and reduction of basal area, ponderosa pine forests experience an increase in understory vegetation in terms of cover and diversity in as little as 2 years posttreatment (Moore et al 2006). In addition, down wood (slash) is usually left onsite for 1-2 years before being burned, adding a source of cover to an otherwise disturbed site.…”
Section: Community Structural Responses To Disturbancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…산림을 대상 으로 한 벌채 작업은 식물 종 다양성의 대부분을 포함하 고 있는 하층 식생의 종풍부도를 증가 (Metlen and Fiedler, 2006;Dodson et al, 2008), 감소 (Metlen et al, 2004;Fulé et al, 2005) 또는 뚜렷하지 않은 (Nelson et al, 2008) 변화 등 다양한 반응을 가져온다. 또한 종 피도 변화는 서식처 선호성, 생육형과 같은 식물 기능군에 따라 다양하게 나 타나는데, 이것은 종 별 교란 내성 및 회복력의 차이가 있 음을 보여준다 (Halpern, 1988;Metlen et al, 2004;Metlen and Fiedler, 2006;Moore et al, 2006). Table 2.…”
Section: 지난 수십 년 간의 관찰 및 실험적 연구들은 교란 후 천 이를 통하여 어떤 군집으로부터 종의 이입 발달 그unclassified
“…Responses of species cover also varied among functional types, suggesting differences in tolerance or resilience to disturbances (Halpern 1988, Metlen et al 2004, Metlen and Fiedler 2006, Moore et al 2006. In understory vegetation, various consequences of secondary succession after forest management are predictable, but the emerging patterns and pathways of disturbed forests are not yet clarified in natural and planted forests in Korea.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%