2017
DOI: 10.1159/000455871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HER2 Overexpression in Retinoblastoma: A Potential Therapeutic Target

Abstract: Background: Retinoblastoma (RB) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy. Current therapies are associated with high morbidity in the short- and long-term. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a transmembrane protein detected in 15-30% of breast cancers, but it has also been described in other malignancies. Recently, it has been claimed that a truncated version of this protein is expressed in RB, responsive to directed therapies in vitro. We scored HER2 overexpression in RB tissue sample… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study focused on the tumor itself, without analysis of adjacent retinal tissues. A subsequent study by Sousa and colleagues questioned the extent of HER2 expression in retinoblastoma, as the protein was immunonegative in 49/60 retinoblastoma cases and very low in 11/60 cases that they tested [9]. Since the Sousa study involved one of the same antibodies used in our study (Sigma, HPA001383), the simplest explanation for this conflicting result was a difference in methodology (shorter incubation periods, different detection methods).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This study focused on the tumor itself, without analysis of adjacent retinal tissues. A subsequent study by Sousa and colleagues questioned the extent of HER2 expression in retinoblastoma, as the protein was immunonegative in 49/60 retinoblastoma cases and very low in 11/60 cases that they tested [9]. Since the Sousa study involved one of the same antibodies used in our study (Sigma, HPA001383), the simplest explanation for this conflicting result was a difference in methodology (shorter incubation periods, different detection methods).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%