1996
DOI: 10.1136/thx.51.11.1168-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatotoxicity of antituberculosis drugs.

Abstract: We read with interest the editorial by Dr Hall (April 1996;51:351-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reintroduction in the setting of fulminant hepatitis is usually considered unsafe. 25 With the help of close monitoring of symptoms and LFT in the present study, it was possible in these patients to reintroduce antitubercular therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Reintroduction in the setting of fulminant hepatitis is usually considered unsafe. 25 With the help of close monitoring of symptoms and LFT in the present study, it was possible in these patients to reintroduce antitubercular therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This was in contrast to the guidelines given by the BTS, where sequential reintroduction of gradually increasing doses at intervals of 2–3 days was suggested 4,9 . The period of 2–3 days was considered insufficient for the identification of the offending drug 25 . The lack of recurrence of ATT‐hepatotoxicity on the reintroduction might be suggestive of the phenomenon of metabolic adaptation 12 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations