2015
DOI: 10.1002/lt.24356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients listed for liver transplantation: Current and future allocation policy and management strategies for the individual patient

Abstract: Liver transplantation can provide definitive cure for patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) when used appropriately. Advances in the management of HCC have allowed improved control of HCC while waiting for liver transplantation and new approaches to candidate selection particularly with regard to tumor burden and downstaging protocols. Additionally, there have been recent changes in allocation policy related to HCC in the U.S. that cap the HCC MELD exception at 34 points and implement a 6-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The policy generally results in HCC registrants with A or O blood type needing to accrue 35 exception points in most regions before receiving LT. 1113 Despite this change and the decreased probability of receiving LT among HCC registrants, the absolute number of HCC recipients continues to increase due to the rapidly increasing number of HCC registrants. Thus, the ratio of HCC versus non HCC registrants increased in all underlying etiologies, suggesting that the increasing burden of HCC is pervasive among registrants with different etiologies of liver disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The policy generally results in HCC registrants with A or O blood type needing to accrue 35 exception points in most regions before receiving LT. 1113 Despite this change and the decreased probability of receiving LT among HCC registrants, the absolute number of HCC recipients continues to increase due to the rapidly increasing number of HCC registrants. Thus, the ratio of HCC versus non HCC registrants increased in all underlying etiologies, suggesting that the increasing burden of HCC is pervasive among registrants with different etiologies of liver disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early‐stage disease is best treated by surgical resection, liver transplantation or local ablative therapies. Surgical resection is commonly contraindicated due to presence of portal hypertension or other medical comorbidities and liver transplantation can be limited by organ availability and strict candidate selection criteria . Thus in a large proportion of early‐stage patients, local ablative therapies are the mainstay of treatment for early‐stage HCC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] organ availability and strict candidate selection criteria. 7 Thus in a large proportion of early-stage patients, local ablative therapies are the mainstay of treatment for early-stage HCC. Results from numerous studies show that the most commonly applied local ablative therapy, thermal (radiofrequency or microwave) ablation, provides local control rates of up to 80-90% for small HCCs (< 4 cm in size).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other investigators have discussed this (5, 12, 18-20), and overall utility (combined dropout / post-transplant survival) is included in the model by Vitale et al (10). Comparing that approach with those studied here is of interest, however the evaluation criteria for comparing the Vitale et al score with the MELD EQ / deMELD is difficult to determine given the differences in objectives between the studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%