2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06465.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepato‐biliary clinical trials and their inclusion in the Cochrane Hepato‐Biliary Group register and reviews

Abstract: A large amount of work has been carried out since 1996. However, there is still much to do, as the CHBG register contains a great number of RCT and CCT on topics that have not yet been systematically reviewed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(117 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The instructions given in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Module were followed. 11,12 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instructions given in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Module were followed. 11,12 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of The CHBG reviews may include on average five or six randomised trials per outcome, but these reviews may still lack firm conclusions, as the traditional metaanalyses used to analyse the data for the review outcomes suffer from type I and type II errors. 4 Such errors may occur due to random errors because of sparse data or because of repetitive testing of the trial data, as the cumulative metaanalysis implies addition of new trials. To control for type I and type II errors and being inspired by the methodology used for interim analyses of a single trial, The CHBG in close collaboration with The Copenhagen Trial Unit (http:// www.ctu.dk) (also hosting The CHBG Editorial Team Office) www.actamedicaportuguesa.com Nikolova D, et al The cochrane hepato-biliary group as a resource of evidence-based medicine, Acta Med Port 2013 Mar-Apr;26(2):81-82 has developed methodology of trial sequential analysis (TSA) 5,6 (http://www.ctu.dk/tsa/index.html).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%