2019
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatitis D: not a rare disease anymore: global update for 2017–2018

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Global estimates for HDV range from 48 to 74 million people. [34][35][36][37][38] High prevalence areas include Central and West Africa, Central Asia, Mongolia, Pakistan, some Pacific Islands, Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Turkey, the Amazonian basin, and Greenland. China accumulates the largest number of HDVinfected people, Pakistan being second.…”
Section: Hepatitis Deltamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global estimates for HDV range from 48 to 74 million people. [34][35][36][37][38] High prevalence areas include Central and West Africa, Central Asia, Mongolia, Pakistan, some Pacific Islands, Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Turkey, the Amazonian basin, and Greenland. China accumulates the largest number of HDVinfected people, Pakistan being second.…”
Section: Hepatitis Deltamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this has been estimated to lie around 5% of the worldwide population infected with HBV (ie ~13 million out of the estimated 257 million HBV carriers), recent work points at much higher figures, that is, up to 72 million persons infected . The methodology and conclusions of this study were seriously questioned, but a reappraisal of the initial meta‐analysis confirmed, nonetheless, the gross underestimation of the worldwide HDV prevalence, emphasizing, in addition, the lack of good quality data. Most prevalence studies have been conducted in low‐risk populations, blood donors and limited geographical areas, which make it impossible to extrapolate their conclusions to whole countries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…1 To better estimate HDV burden, we revisited the previous studies on this topic (Table 1). [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] We re-estimated HDV prevalence using 2 approaches based on the general population or HBV carriers, respectively. Among the general population, we calculated the overlap interval of the lower bound of these previous metaanalyses, but excluded the current Stockdale study due to their bias.…”
Section: Revisiting the Estimation Of Hepatitis D Global Prevalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described, 2 we excluded HDV IgM antibody and HDV antigen as these markers are inconsistently expressed in people with HDV infection. 5 Although some previous meta-analyses included markers such as HDV IgM and HDV antigen, we…”
Section: Reply To: "Revisiting the Estimation Of Hepatitis D Global Pmentioning
confidence: 99%