2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatitis B virus markers among teenagers in the Araguaia region, Central Brazil: Assessment of prevalence and vaccination coverage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is similar to those of a survey conducted at the University of Bahia (Brazil) (11) and a study conducted at the Mato Grosso (Brazil) (30). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result is similar to those of a survey conducted at the University of Bahia (Brazil) (11) and a study conducted at the Mato Grosso (Brazil) (30). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, when the analysis was performed, only among students who reported having completed the vaccination, the percentage of people unprotected decreased to 12.5%, showing the importance of completing the scheme. In the literature, the percentage of healthcare professionals who remain unprotected after 3 doses of vaccine, ranged from 5.85% to 20.9% (7, 24, 30, 31). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only 27% of surveyed individuals remembered having been vaccinated, and the serological marker indicative of vaccine protection was identified in only 18% of uninfected individuals, consistent with the information provided by the participants. A previous study in a small city in a non-Amazonian region in Mato Grosso revealed that 56% of assessed adolescents exhibited evidence of a vaccine response (anti-HBsAg-positivity alone) 21 . Data from our present study are more alarming given that vaccination-related serological patterns were even worse in individuals under 20 years of age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%