1999
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.153.6.619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatitis B Maternal Screening, Infant Vaccination, and Infant Prophylaxis Practices in North Carolina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study by Yusuf et al, 13 9 of 12 exposed infants were vaccinated and 8 of 12 received HBIG (timing unspecified). In the study by Pierce et al, 10 7 of 9 were vaccinated within 24 hours (HBIG administration not reported). Administration of HepB to infants who were born to women with unknown HBsAg status was higher in this study than in that reported by Yusuf et al (22%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the study by Yusuf et al, 13 9 of 12 exposed infants were vaccinated and 8 of 12 received HBIG (timing unspecified). In the study by Pierce et al, 10 7 of 9 were vaccinated within 24 hours (HBIG administration not reported). Administration of HepB to infants who were born to women with unknown HBsAg status was higher in this study than in that reported by Yusuf et al (22%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Infants who were born to women with inconsistencies in documented HBsAg status were less likely to receive prophylaxis, which has been reported previously. 10 The strongest predictor of newborn HepB receipt was having a written hospital policy for HepB administration at birth, highlighting the importance of such policies. Newborn HepB coverage was higher in this study (69%) than that reported in the 2007 National Immunization Survey (NIS) where 53.2% of newborns were vaccinated by the third day of life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate is, however, much higher than that reported from developed countries. A sero‐prevalence rate of 0.2% was reported among pregnant women in North Carolina, United States of America (13), whilst a sero‐prevalence of 1.6% was recently reported from the King Fahd Hospital, Saudi‐Arabia (14). The rate is also higher than those reported from recent studies in other parts of Nigeria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Greece, the carrier rate in pregnant women varies between 2.8 and 3.0% [25]. In the US, the prevalence of HBs Ag among pregnant women [26][27][28] showed differences according to race or ethnicity: white (0.1-0.6%), African American (0.1-0.7%), Hispanic (0.4%), Asian (4.6-8.8%). The prevalences were comparable in Asian populations living in US and in France, but African women living in France have had higher HBs Ag prevalences than African American women (4.61-7.48%).…”
Section: Influence Of the Ethnic Originmentioning
confidence: 99%