2003
DOI: 10.6009/jjrt.kj00000921686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatic Perfusion CT Imaging Analyzed by the Dual-input One-compartment Model

Abstract: The dual-input one-compartmental model makes it possible to obtain more detailed information on liver hemodynamics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, dual-input, one-compartment model analysis was adopted for dynamic CT perfusion analysis in liver disease. [9][10][11] This method may be more reliable than single-input, one-compartment model analysis. However, in either case, it is very di‹cult to apply an optimal model for the target organ or disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, dual-input, one-compartment model analysis was adopted for dynamic CT perfusion analysis in liver disease. [9][10][11] This method may be more reliable than single-input, one-compartment model analysis. However, in either case, it is very di‹cult to apply an optimal model for the target organ or disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed description of these methods is available elsewhere. 1,2,[12][13][14][15][16][17] Liver ROIs on the perfusion maps for perfusion measurements were made as large as possible to cover the entire hepatic normal parenchyma on the slice while avoiding large vessels and focal liver lesions if they were present. Arrival time of contrast material at the abdominal aorta (arrival time), transit time, and compensation for respiratory misregistration were recorded as extrahepatic factors, which could affect estimated hepatic perfusion values.…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, hepatic arterial and portal perfusions (HAP and HPP, ml/min/dl) and arterial perfusion fraction (APF, %) were calculated with the above-mentioned two methods using free software (Basama Perfusion Version 3.1.0.4). 14 Regions of interest (ROIs) were placed at the abdominal aorta at the level of the celiac axis, the main portal vein, and the liver to generate time-density curves (TDCs). Based on these TDCs, with the MS method, HAP was determined by dividing the peak gradient of the hepatic TDC before the peak splenic enhancement (arterial-dominant phase) by the peak aortic enhancement.…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the imaging condition generally used in clinical settings (Funabasama et al 2003, Miyazaki et al 2008, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for a voxel was approximately 10-20. Therefore, we considered two cases with SNR of 10 and 20 in this study.…”
Section: Computer Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, noise-free C a (t) was generated by interpolating and fitting actually measured data using gamma-variate functions. The data were acquired using a CT scanner (HiSpeed Nx/i, GE-Yokogawa Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) with a tube voltage of 120 kV and a tube current of 100 mA (Funabasama et al 2003). A total of 20 scans (12 scans with a duration of 2 s and 8 scans with a duration of 7 s) were acquired with a gantry rotation speed of 1 s/rotation, a slice thickness of 10 mm, and a matrix size of 512 × 512.…”
Section: Appendix Generation Of C a (T) And C P (T)mentioning
confidence: 99%