2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00247-004-1195-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatic and colonic perforation by an abandoned ventriculoperitoneal shunt

Abstract: We report a case of an abandoned distal limb of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt that resulted in hepatic as well as colonic perforation in a 12-year-old girl. Although it is common practice at the time of shunt revision to leave a retained distal catheter in the peritoneal cavity, we suggest this can result in perforation of solid as well as hollow viscera.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The etiologies are categorized into 2 mechanisms: 1) acute-traumatic type, in which the initial use of a trocar for distal shunt placement contributes to perforation, and 2) chronic-irritative type, in which shunt migration and adhesion at the entry site lead to perforation of the viscus. 10 In 2 of the cases reviewed, perforation of multiple organs was diagnosed at different chronological points, 5,8 and in our case the small bowel was perforated multiple times. It can be deduced that movements of the distal catheter over time resulted in perforation and that acute trauma from the trocar had no role.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The etiologies are categorized into 2 mechanisms: 1) acute-traumatic type, in which the initial use of a trocar for distal shunt placement contributes to perforation, and 2) chronic-irritative type, in which shunt migration and adhesion at the entry site lead to perforation of the viscus. 10 In 2 of the cases reviewed, perforation of multiple organs was diagnosed at different chronological points, 5,8 and in our case the small bowel was perforated multiple times. It can be deduced that movements of the distal catheter over time resulted in perforation and that acute trauma from the trocar had no role.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The most frequent (45%) finding in delayed bowel perforation by VP shunt catheters is protrusion of the distal catheter from the anus [1]. In my opinion, this protrusion seems like a chance for the patient as it helps the early diagnosis of perforation as in the case presented herein.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…When cranial imaging studies (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging) are without relevant new pathological findings and conventional X-ray may demonstrate unusual positioning of the tip of the VP shunting system, visceral irritation by the shunt itself has to be considered. In more severe cases, this may even result in the perforation of abdominal organs by the catheter [3,5]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report in written form that describes a malpositioned VP shunt as a cause for recurrent painful episodes in a severely neurologically impaired child.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 96%