1970
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(70)90462-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatic Allografts and Xenografts in Primates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As another example, when as a consequence of abdominal surgery bacteria enter the blood and activate complement, the liver is spared from complement-mediated necrosis, even as its function is impaired by bacterial toxins (6). Similarly, when the liver is transplanted into recipients who have complement-fixing Abs against Ags carried by the graft, hyperacute or acute vascular rejection is rarely observed (22,49,50) and, thus, the liver is said to "resist" humoral injury (51). Given these considerations, understanding the means by which the liver resists complement-mediated injury might allow the devising of strategies to protect other organs from complement or to reverse complement-mediated disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As another example, when as a consequence of abdominal surgery bacteria enter the blood and activate complement, the liver is spared from complement-mediated necrosis, even as its function is impaired by bacterial toxins (6). Similarly, when the liver is transplanted into recipients who have complement-fixing Abs against Ags carried by the graft, hyperacute or acute vascular rejection is rarely observed (22,49,50) and, thus, the liver is said to "resist" humoral injury (51). Given these considerations, understanding the means by which the liver resists complement-mediated injury might allow the devising of strategies to protect other organs from complement or to reverse complement-mediated disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because Russek (Rodriquez-Zendejaset al, 1968) did not merely transect the nerve fibers to the liver, he may have damaged fibers to and from receptors involved in the control of feeding behavior elsewhere in the gut, i.e., intestinal glucose receptors and/or amino acid receptors (Sharma, 1967), or intestinal osmoreceptors (Hsiao and Langenes, 1971). However, firm neuroanatomical evidence against the involvement of the liver as a major controller of feeding behavior has been presented by liver transplant studies (Calne et al, 1967(Calne et al, , 1968(Calne et al, , 1969(Calne et al, , 1970. While food intake measurements were not given in these liver transplant studies performed on pigs (Calne et al, 1967(Calne et al, , 1969, monkeys (Calne, 1970), and in man (Calne, 1968), in which all liver nerve fibers must have been transected, several of the subjects recovered without apparent impairments of food intake.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, firm neuroanatomical evidence against the involvement of the liver as a major controller of feeding behavior has been presented by liver transplant studies (Calne et al, 1967(Calne et al, , 1968(Calne et al, , 1969(Calne et al, , 1970. While food intake measurements were not given in these liver transplant studies performed on pigs (Calne et al, 1967(Calne et al, , 1969, monkeys (Calne, 1970), and in man (Calne, 1968), in which all liver nerve fibers must have been transected, several of the subjects recovered without apparent impairments of food intake. Further support for the role of gut factors other than the liver in affecting feeding behavior have come from the recent findings that gut hormonal mechanisms may also play a role in influencing feeding behavior (Gibbs et al, 1973;Rezek et al, 1975).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimations of serum enzymes showed no significant disturbances in biliary flow and liver function at any time. These results prompted us to use this technique in liver transplantation in rhesus monkeys as well, since the cholecystoduodenostomy used by Calne [3] and Fortner [8] in primate liver transplantation is known to cause severe cholangitis and obstruction (at the cystic duct) in the animals surviving longer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, our longest surviving patient (more than 6 years) also had to be reoperated for bile duct stenosis after 21/2 years. As alternative methods for biliary reconstruction, cholecysto-and choledochoduodenostomy have been tried experimentally and clinically, but almost invariably led to cholangitis and obstruction [3,8,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%