2010
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181e463a7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatectomy With Simultaneous Resection of the Portal Vein and Hepatic Artery for Advanced Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Abstract: Major hepatectomy with simultaneous resection and reconstruction of the portal vein and hepatic artery is technically demanding. However, this surgery can be performed with acceptable mortality by an experienced surgeon and offers a better chance of long-term survival in selected patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
287
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 275 publications
(294 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
287
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…They reach 66% of R0 resection with 2% mortality rate, 54% morbidity rate and 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of 78.9%, 36.3%, and 30.3%, respectively, but these data are not reproducible [86] . Su et al [39] , Miyazaki et al [87] and Muñoz et al [91] reported as a conclusion that, although both portal vein and hepatic artery resection are independent poor prognostic factors after curative operative resection for locally advanced HCC, portal vein resection is acceptable from an operative risk perspective and might improve the prognosis in the selected patients, but combined hepatic artery resection cannot be justified because the 3-year survival rate is 0%.…”
Section: Vascular Resectionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…They reach 66% of R0 resection with 2% mortality rate, 54% morbidity rate and 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of 78.9%, 36.3%, and 30.3%, respectively, but these data are not reproducible [86] . Su et al [39] , Miyazaki et al [87] and Muñoz et al [91] reported as a conclusion that, although both portal vein and hepatic artery resection are independent poor prognostic factors after curative operative resection for locally advanced HCC, portal vein resection is acceptable from an operative risk perspective and might improve the prognosis in the selected patients, but combined hepatic artery resection cannot be justified because the 3-year survival rate is 0%.…”
Section: Vascular Resectionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…65 Other prognostic factors after R0 resection for CCA include lymph node metastasis, perineural invasion and combined vascular resection due to portal vein and/ or hepatic artery invasion. 1,54,[66][67][68] In hilar CCA, the invasion depth of the tumour (!5 mm versus <5 mm) has been reported to be a better predictor of long-term outcome than the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. 69 In patients with ICC, the macroscopic histopathology has been shown to be useful for predicting survival after hepatectomy, with the massforming plus periductal infiltrating type having a more unfavourable prognosis than the mass-forming type.…”
Section: -57mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in this series. Some investigators advocated the use of microscope for hepatic artery reconstructions in this type of operation (1,2,6). However, the outer diameter of the proper hepatic artery is approximately 5 mm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, they concluded that such operations could not be justified. On the other hand, Nagino et al (2) reported the acceptable mortality of cholangiocarcinoma operation with simultaneous resections and reconstructions of the portal vein and the hepatic artery. Nevertheless, this operation is one of the most complicated and the most challenging ones in abdominal surgeries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%