2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.03.172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatectomy for malignancy in the aged population: a comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We previously reported that hepatectomies are safe in older patients and don't cause higher postoperative mortality when compared to younger patients. However, older patients were prone to have one or more postoperative complications, especially infectious, when compared to younger patients [12]. Other reports showed that first and repeated resection of liver metastases can be safely performed in older patients [22][23][24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We previously reported that hepatectomies are safe in older patients and don't cause higher postoperative mortality when compared to younger patients. However, older patients were prone to have one or more postoperative complications, especially infectious, when compared to younger patients [12]. Other reports showed that first and repeated resection of liver metastases can be safely performed in older patients [22][23][24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many physicians are reluctant to carry a curative approach in older patients, taking into consideration the associated morbidities and early mortality. Our group previously reported that hepatectomies in older patients did not have a higher 90-days mortality rate when compared to younger patients, though it carried higher risk of complications [12]. We aimed to report our center's experience and survival analysis of older patients with CRLM who underwent curative liver resection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%