1997
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.d01-2056.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis: a prospective analysis of the incidence in patients with heart and cerebrovascular diseases

Abstract: Summary. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and/or thrombosis (HITT) are serious complications of heparin treatment. The incidence, as previously reported, varies widely and, in consequence, is not precisely known. Moreover, most reports only concern clinically defined heparininduced thrombocytopenia. Therefore we carried out a prospective study of the incidence of serologically confirmed HITT.All patients admitted to the Departments of Cardiology and Neurology of our institution with an indication for treatment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2b, to give increased specificity of binding and activation. There are good reasons for doing this, as current therapy with heparin is limited by its heterogeneity, with some of the oligosaccharide binding to blood platelets causing their aggregation by immune mechanisms to give the distressing disorder thrombotic thrombocytopenia (37). In the longer term, the new structures also open the prospect (38) of the design of nonsaccharide mimetics, which, unlike heparin, could be administered orally.…”
Section: ͚͚I͉i(h) ϫ I(h)i͉͚͚͞i͉i(h)i͉ Where I(h)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2b, to give increased specificity of binding and activation. There are good reasons for doing this, as current therapy with heparin is limited by its heterogeneity, with some of the oligosaccharide binding to blood platelets causing their aggregation by immune mechanisms to give the distressing disorder thrombotic thrombocytopenia (37). In the longer term, the new structures also open the prospect (38) of the design of nonsaccharide mimetics, which, unlike heparin, could be administered orally.…”
Section: ͚͚I͉i(h) ϫ I(h)i͉͚͚͞i͉i(h)i͉ Where I(h)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This low incidence of HIT was also seen in other studies involving medical in patients but the proportion of patients with HIT developing thrombosis was high (50-67%) (16)(17)(18). Analysis of renal patients on haemodialysis also indicate a low incidence of antibody formation (combined incidence 2.6%) with very few patients noted to be thrombocytopenic and none with thrombotic complications (19)(20)(21)(22)(23).…”
Section: Clinical Features Of Hitmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The incidence of HIT in patients treated systematically with high doses of unfractionated heparin lies between 0.3 and 2.7% [16, 19]. Fractionated, low–molecular–weight heparin seems to abolish the risk of HIT completely [16, 19]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have been performed to elucidate the possible mechanism of HIT, which involves the binding of platelet factor–4/heparin complex to the heparin receptor on the platelet, and is dependent on heparin concentration [17, 18]. An autoantibody then triggers an immune response in some (but not all) patients [19]. The incidence of HIT in patients treated systematically with high doses of unfractionated heparin lies between 0.3 and 2.7% [16, 19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%