1969
DOI: 10.1080/0002889698506002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HEPA Filter Efficiencies Using Thermal and Air-Jet Generated Dioctyl Phthalate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An analysis of the difference between light scattering penetration and mass penetration for DOP was made by constructing a cumulative plot, Figure 3, of fraction of light scattering versus particle size based on the photometer response curve 7 and the log normal size distribution for the DOP aerosol. 6 Using this plot and assuming a sharp impaction size cutoff, the cutoff diameter required to give any selected light scattering penetration can be determined and applied to the cumulative mass distribution to give the equivalent mass penetration. By this procedure, equivalent mass penetration was found to be less than light scattering penetration in all cases; e.g., the ratio of mass to light scattering penetration was 0.22, 0.16, and 0.10 for light scattering penetrations of 50%, 10%, and 1%.…”
Section: Filter Penetration Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An analysis of the difference between light scattering penetration and mass penetration for DOP was made by constructing a cumulative plot, Figure 3, of fraction of light scattering versus particle size based on the photometer response curve 7 and the log normal size distribution for the DOP aerosol. 6 Using this plot and assuming a sharp impaction size cutoff, the cutoff diameter required to give any selected light scattering penetration can be determined and applied to the cumulative mass distribution to give the equivalent mass penetration. By this procedure, equivalent mass penetration was found to be less than light scattering penetration in all cases; e.g., the ratio of mass to light scattering penetration was 0.22, 0.16, and 0.10 for light scattering penetrations of 50%, 10%, and 1%.…”
Section: Filter Penetration Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DOP was aerosolized by a compressed air atomizer 5 that produced droplets having a count median diameter of 0.8 jum and a geometric standard deviation of 1.65. 6 Size characteristics of this aerosol were found to be constant with time. For the DOP tests, filter penetration was determined by light scattering measurements upstream and downstream of the filter using a light scattering photometer designed specifically for filter testing.…”
Section: Experimental Arrangementsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Each time point included five mice exposed to ambient air (Whole Air) and five mice exposed to air filtered through a HEPA filtration unit (True-HEPA, model 200 -001, Bemis Manufacturing, Sheboygan Falls, WI). HEPA filtration removes at least 99.97% of particles 0.3 m in diameter (65). Given the duration of spermatogenesis, sperm sampled from the caudal epididymis of mice held for 3 wks were postmeiotic spermatocytes and spermatids during the exposure period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This experimental design enabled a comparison of germline mutation rates between sites, and also within sites between groups exposed to ambient air and HEPAfiltered air. HEPA filtration removes only particulate matter (at least 99.97% of all particles >0.3 µm in diameter; [Ettinger et al 1969]), so mice inside of HEPA chambers were exposed to ambient air that was essentially particulate-free, but still contained gas-phase constituents. Animals were exposed for 10 weeks in situ, and then bred within groups after a 9-week delay in the laboratory for the reasons described above.…”
Section: Sentinel Animal Studies Of Air Pollution and Germline Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%