2016 23rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icpr.2016.7899614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HEp-2 cell classification and segmentation using motif texture patterns and spatial features with random forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the ICPR-2014 dataset (same as the ICIP-2013 dataset) is the most recent and of much larger scale than that of ICPR12, we use this dataset for validation and compare our framework. This is similar to other works such as [11,[30][31][32][33][34] which also use the same dataset. More recent reviews of this topic were provided by [6,35].…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 66%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Since the ICPR-2014 dataset (same as the ICIP-2013 dataset) is the most recent and of much larger scale than that of ICPR12, we use this dataset for validation and compare our framework. This is similar to other works such as [11,[30][31][32][33][34] which also use the same dataset. More recent reviews of this topic were provided by [6,35].…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Due to this reason, we are not adding table for protocol 2. Table 9 illustrates the performance comparison (using both the protocols) among various methods, where in [30][31][32] utilized random forest for classification, [11,33] are recent methods using, arguably, more sophisticated features, and the work of [34] uses deep learning. For the methods in [33,34], the numbers in brackets denote the results with data augmentation.…”
Section: Results: Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations